This article is part of WikiProject Vietnam, an attempt to create a comprehensive, neutral, and accurate representation of Vietnam on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the
project page.VietnamWikipedia:WikiProject VietnamTemplate:WikiProject VietnamVietnam articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
bridges and
tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the
project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
May I suggest moving the page to
2007 Collapse of Can Tho Bridge, since this seems more in line with current event/natural disaster naming conventions? (And also avoids having one prepositional phrase after another.) To all who have worked on the article, by the way, great job :D
GracenotesT§00:28, 28 September 2007 (UTC)reply
As someone who has worked on a few disaster articles, I feel that the current title (Collapse of the Can Tho Bridge) is probably fine; in this case we do not need the year as we have a very specific event alread merely with the name of the bridge, which is, after all, unique.
Blood Red Sandman(Talk)(Contribs)06:43, 28 September 2007 (UTC)reply
can someone update the cause?
it states on the article page: Early hypotheses suggest that quick removal of scaffold (2 days) may have been the cause of the accident.[4]
what the hell does (2 days) mean? it's not clear at all, and for someone reading it, they might not understand - like what i've just done.
i really do wish that when people update this site, they re-read what they've written to make sure it actually makes sense - 2 days means absolutely nothing in this sentence.
I have just modified 3 external links on
Collapse of Cần Thơ Bridge. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.