This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Constructed languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
constructed languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Constructed languagesWikipedia:WikiProject Constructed languagesTemplate:WikiProject Constructed languagesconstructed language articles
ISO 15924 is for scripts rather than languages, so it isn't appropriate to add it to the table. (Blissymbols is a script as well as a language.) I haven't checked all the articles for correctness. --
Zundark20:01, 30 October 2007 (UTC)reply
Do any of the other languages listed have strongly associated scripts that have codes? I think it's worth adding, perhaps with a note explaining that one set of codes are for the language itself, and the other for the script.
Sai Emrys¿?✍23:01, 30 October 2007 (UTC)reply
Europanto
I propose to delete the line referring to
Europanto since the associated code elements are no longer valid. Doug Ewell 19:24, 6 August 2010 (UTC) —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
DougEwell (
talk •
contribs)
Much as I would like to have it, I could not find any evidence on a sublanguage "simple" in BCP 47 (rfc4647/rfc5646). I think that statement should be removed - unless a reference can be found.
— Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Wanenc (
talk •
contribs) 2021-06-01 (UTC)