Cloyster was nominated as a good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (August 1, 2006). There are suggestions below for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
I worked heaps on this page and I think it turned out as one of the most complete Pokemon articles. :) - WindFish 05:59, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
Hmmm, yes, this certainly is one of them. I might even say that this is the standard by which all other Pokemon articles are to be measured... In the ideal world, all the other 390 Pokemon have articles as complete as this. - Erik the Appreciator (D'oh, I don't really get this signature business right.)
Needs work, H ig hway Batman! 10:29, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
Let me give a lesson on italics and references -
Now for references -
.<ref>
. <ref> </ref>.
The article is still choppy, the formatting is terrbile, the prose is not paragraphed correctly. The article is badly referenced, and the sections intro in other GAs, like Combusken, are lacking. Try again, H ig hway Return to Oz... 16:10, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
There are no references in parts of the video games, the anime and the TCG. Do not renominate articles without making any edits. H ig hway Return to Oz... 14:57, 1 August 2006 (UTC)