This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brighton, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource about Brighton and Hove. If you would like to participate, please visit the
project pageBrightonWikipedia:WikiProject BrightonTemplate:WikiProject BrightonBrighton articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
A fact from Clock Tower, Brighton appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the Did you know column on 8 June 2010 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that the Clock Tower in
Brighton city centre has been variously described as "delightful", "worthless", "a giant salt-cellar", "charmingly ugly" and "supremely confident"?
The great majority of sources refer to it thus. I know there are other clock towers in Brighton, but it is (in my experience of the sources) unusual for this one to be referred to by its full name, Jubilee Clock Tower; rather, this one typically takes "Clock Tower" and the others take "Preston Park Clock Tower", "Queen's Park Clock Tower" etc. Hassocks5489 (tickets please!)12:30, 14 March 2012 (UTC)reply
Sorry, it was more the ", Brighton" I was concerned about. Something like "Clock Tower (Brighton)" looks more
Oh, I see what you mean. I don't think there's an official policy on this, other than the guidance to aim for consistency across articles. When I started to write building/church articles that needed disambiguation by place, I found that the majority seemed to have the "X, Y" construction rather than "X (Y)", so I went with that and continued on that basis. (Certainly in respect of UK-related articles; I think US-related articles seem to favour the "X (Y)" construction, though.) Hassocks5489 (tickets please!)17:07, 14 March 2012 (UTC)reply
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on
Clock Tower, Brighton. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.