This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Oppose - We don't locate articles at (marque) locations, it is also a term that is meaningless for a lot of countries. Division is the most accurate way of describing things anyway, as Chrysler is a division of FCA - something that article also describes.
Lukeno94(tell Luke off here)14:57, 12 May 2015 (UTC)reply
That's odd, since this article starts with the words "Chrysler is an American car brand and the longstanding premium marque of automaker FCA". Marque is the commonly used word for car brand in the English language, and this is the English language WP. A Google search for "Chrysler division" actually shows third party sources most often using the term to refer to FCA US LLC as a part of FCA rather than referring to just the Chrysler brand ex Jeep, Dodge, Ram etc (
https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=Chrysler+divsion&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&gws_rd=cr&ei=ZBtSVdXRMIroUoqVgdAD#q=Chrysler+division&start=0). The current arrangement, with the company/subsidiary FCA US LLC taking the article name "Chrysler" is also a mess, that is not the dominant useage of the word, if anything the brand is.
92.4.113.150 (
talk)
15:30, 12 May 2015 (UTC)reply
Oppose. Maybe "Chrysler (brand)", but certainly not "Chrysler (marque)" per
WP:ENGVAR purposes. I doubt "marque" is more commonly used in
American English than "brand". In fact, all instances of "marque" should be changed to "brand".
Zzyzx11 (
talk)
02:12, 13 May 2015 (UTC)reply
Comment except it isn't the branding "Chrysler", it's a particular mark/marque/make of car, the brand itself is much broader than just this make. --
65.94.43.89 (
talk)
04:58, 13 May 2015 (UTC)reply
Oppose per
WP:ENGVAR, and I agree that the word "marque" should be removed the article, as it seems very out of place when referring to an American product.
Krychek (
talk)
19:34, 18 May 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Requested move 20 March 2016
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Moved per clear consensus. (
non-admin closure) (even though I was a lone dissenter for a while, I feel OK closing this as I have no potential conflict of interest and nobody else opposes it, and the admins and other closers are swamped.)
Dicklyon (
talk)
04:57, 19 April 2016 (UTC)reply
Oppose – At this time, the article is as much about organizations as about brands. Perhaps a more general proposal to reorganize the treatment would make more sense than a move at this time?
Dicklyon (
talk)
04:17, 21 March 2016 (UTC)reply
Hello. I agree the cluster of articles
Chrysler/
Chrysler (division)/
Fiat need some TLC. Not sure I agree that this article "is as much about organizations as about brands." The lede of this article is "Chrysler is an American car brand..." The content is mostly about Chrysler brands. Thanks.
Hugh (
talk)
15:55, 21 March 2016 (UTC)reply
Support. "Division" is a ridiculous and meaningless disambiguator. I would prefer "marque", but according to the discussion above this isn't commonly used in America. --
Necrothesp (
talk)
13:21, 7 April 2016 (UTC)reply
Support. The article is about the Chrysler brand, not a particular division of the business currently in charge of the brand.--
Cúchullaint/
c18:46, 11 April 2016 (UTC)reply
Support - This short article is mainly about the brand. It only briefly mentions the automaker's previous organization into marketing "divisions" for sales operations. It then lists the various models marketed under the Chrysler brand name.
CZmarlin (
talk)
01:42, 19 April 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Maybe it would be excessive and make the section too long, but surely the near collapse, Iaccoca and then rapid growth would be worth noting? Maybe not
Tdp2612 (
talk)
19:51, 1 February 2018 (UTC)reply
I agree that this page is incomplete, however, I believe that such information is present in, and belongs in the article on
Chrysler, the overarching company that sold vehicles under an eponymous brand. I do think the incompleteness of this article should be drawn to attention. QuadraticEquation 20:13, 6 July 2018 (UTC) — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
QuadraticEquation (
talk •
contribs)