This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Robert was married possibly to Glismoda of Bavaria, parentage unknown.
This puzzles me. Does the word 'possibly' refer to the possibility that there was no marriage? Is it implying that the marriage was invalid? Or is it trying to say she was a concubine? Or is it a query as to whether the marriage (or concubinage) was with some woman, whose name might have been Glismoda the Bavarian? The statement is unreferenced, and desperately needs to be footnoted.
My best guess is that, as it is the case with most information in this article, the sources cited are guesswork at best, hence 'possible'. Settipani's work isn't verifiable. The only really credible source (medieval lands, added by me) -which is based on rather terse source material- does not contain a literal reference to the bishop, who is only known from a later episcopal catalogue. Everything is based on a supposed relationship between a number of individuals all named 'Robert'. It seems several individuals were mixed up.
Harachte (
talk)
21:31, 30 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Something is wrong
How could he would die after 695 as his grandson Chrodbert II died after 678??