This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Chelsea page. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Disambiguation | ||||
|
As more items listed are place names rather than persons' names, I've changed the notice at the bottom to use Template:Geodis rather than Template:Hndis. Bazza 14:21, 12 April 2006 (UTC) to je sranje
IMO Chelsea should redirect to Chelsea FC with a link at the top to go to the disambiguation page
Re:I disagree. The word 'Chelsea' amounts to more than a football club. Thus, it shouldn't take priority.
I agree, and by democracy, I will put it up there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tk TommyKim ( talk • contribs) 15:41, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
Chelsea should direct the viewer to the page for the London borough of Chelsea, for two very good reasons:
Re: Again, while the area of London's use of Chelsea is considerably prominent, there are many other unrelated but highly relevant uses for the word, as shown by other such areas in America and/or organizations that are perhaps arguably more known for the use of Chelsea. As such, the area of London shouldn't take priority. 195.92.40.49 13:56, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
A user posted this heading with no text under it but with an edit summary I'll reproduce here to be nice: Given the proliferation of the name/term, could someone add more info on the origen of the name/term? Largoplazo ( talk) 10:14, 6 July 2021 (UTC)