![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
I removed the tone numbers in the comparative chart, since each language had a different convention, making them worse than useless for comparison. kwami ( talk) 09:30, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
I've gone back to earlier editions of this page where the original tone letter rendering was present. However, since then, new information with slight differences in pronunciation in the Hokkien examples have occured. I'm preserving the following so other wikipedians with a good grasp of Hokkien can edit the piece and see which is appropriate.
Edit 20 Jan 2011 - this was so the tone letters could be included.
[hɐp˥]
[sip˥], [tsap˥]
[hut˥], [put˥]
[pat˩], [peʔ˩]
[ek˥], [iaʔ˥]
[kʰek˩], [kʰeʔ˩]
Previously the IPA had diacrtitics rather than tone letters.
[háp], [háʔ]
[síp], [tsáp]
[hút], [pút]
[pat], [pueʔ]
[ík], [iáʔ]
[kʰik], [kʰeʔ]
As you can see, there are vowel differences and spellings which need to be addressed. Dylanwhs ( talk) 10:46, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Checked tone. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:05, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
In the article I read:
I wonder whether the author meant:
Can s/he please comment on this? Redav ( talk) 22:53, 22 February 2020 (UTC)