![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I found this note on a National Weather Service site today [1]:
Since this technique is still in use today in the worldwide maritime industry, it seems appropriate for mention in his biography. There are also probably opportunities to link to other articles. -- AJim ( talk) 18:01, 23 May 2016 (UTC) I see, for instance that Radiofax#History does not list this event in the timeline. -- AJim ( talk) 18:17, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Charles Francis Jenkins. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:04, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
In his How Motion Pictures Are Made (1918), Homer Croy cites a 6 June 1894 Richmond Telegram article with the head "A Genius - C. Francis Jenkins - Formerly a Resident of This City - His new Invention, The Phantoscope - The Most Wonderful Ever Invented By a Wayne County Citizen". Croy describes the event rather fanciful and his text was sometimes quoted as if from the original article (this wikipedia article being one of the guilty parties). It seems worthwhile to see what information can be found in the original report. Joortje1 ( talk) 13:47, 18 September 2021 (UTC)