This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Empire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
British Empire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British EmpireWikipedia:WikiProject British EmpireTemplate:WikiProject British EmpireBritish Empire articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Singapore, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to
Singapore on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SingaporeWikipedia:WikiProject SingaporeTemplate:WikiProject SingaporeSingapore articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
Comments
B-class, but could do with more references and in-line citation if possible. Good job again, nonetheless. -
SpLoT //
12:21, 17 May 2007 (UTC)reply
Hi SpLoT, I've added the in-text citation as per previous references accordingly. Thanks for your favourable assessment & compliments earlier. -
Aldwinteo04:53, 21 May 2007 (UTC)reply
Since this is actually an article about paintings, don't you think some recognition of this in terms of projects, categories, and even discussion of their style in the article would be a good idea?
Johnbod (
talk)
22:05, 15 December 2007 (UTC)reply
According to my earlier research for this article, except for its history & basic description, there's little references on its style, categories or artistic commentaries known to date. Due to its background & the fact that the site of the paintings is located in a restricted area now, I think it somehow did not generate a follow-up by anyone to do an in-depth research on its artistic aspect in later years. Nonetheless, I welcome anyone who could direct me or include such info with relevant citation where it's available. Thank u for your interest in the article. --
Aldwinteo (
talk)
11:55, 17 December 2007 (UTC)reply
I misunderstood your statement earlier. Nonetheless, I've added it under the "murals" category. As u r more familiar on this area, do add it under the appropriate artistic categories/projects if nec. --
Aldwinteo (
talk)
15:37, 17 December 2007 (UTC)reply
Apols for clunky merge template, but suggest we merge this article with
Stanley Warren because the bio is brief stub because it suffers from inter doubling of info from this article - which WP discourages. Changi Murals has so much biography of Warren that suggest the articles be merged either under the painter/artist with a redirect from a Changi Murals link, or if Changi Murals is already a GA maybe a redirect biography link can be made to it. Thanks,
Manytexts (
talk)
07:10, 9 February 2013 (UTC)reply
Manytexts make a good point, entirely consistent with
WP:ONEEVENT. That would suggest a merge of Stanley Warren into Changi Murals, as the event (the painting of the murals) is what is notable. However, they could be kept as separate articles if the event and the person have generated sufficient coverage. Given the lasting cultural impact of the murals, it might well be reasonable to keep them as separate pages. I can see the argument either way, but lean towards no merge.
Klbrain (
talk)
16:34, 17 August 2016 (UTC)reply
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on
Changi Murals. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.