This article is written in
Singaporean English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, centre, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other
varieties of English. According to the
relevant style guide, this should not be changed without
broad consensus.
Changi Airport was one of the Engineering and technology good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the
good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be
renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Singapore, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to
Singapore on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SingaporeWikipedia:WikiProject SingaporeTemplate:WikiProject SingaporeSingapore articles
This article is within the scope of the
Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of
open tasks and
task forces. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Changi Airport Bus Terminal was nominated for
deletion.
The discussion was closed on 22 July 2017 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were
merged into
Changi Airport. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see
its history; for its talk page, see
here.
I would tentatively support such a split, as it seems sensible to not have such long lists on otherwise mostly prose airport articles (a format split rather than a size split). I can see the benefits in readability, and also in hiving off what is the main target for unsourced changes in these articles. My support is only tentative as this seems like the sort of idea that should have some expected standard over various airports (or at least those with let's say over 10 destinations), and so it might be useful to have a slightly wider discussion over a localised consensus.
CMD (
talk)
09:57, 11 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Strong oppose Absolutely no reason to make readers go to a separate page for this. It's key information readers go to airport articles for, and it's a disservice to move that out. The article is not difficult to read because one table is long, and this would achieve nothing.
Reywas92Talk21:44, 17 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Strong oppose I agree with what the user above wrote. There is absolutely no need for a separate article to be created just for airport destinations. The lists are integral parts of airport Wikipedia pages and there is no need to separate and create a different page just for lists.
Yellow alligator (
talk)
The Changi Airport’s Wikipedia page is showing Changi Airport Singapore logo which is no longer in use.
A Changi Airport Group staff has changed it to Changi Airport Group logo in 2017 using their official wiki account but recently (2023) someone change it back and now their account is suspended.
Is there a long-term solution for this?
Also, we need to put in a footnote that the Changi Airport Singapore logo is obsolete.
@
Cankin3 and
202.55.83.233: Continuing the discussion I left on your talkpage, there is unnecessary for logos to include anything like "airport group", "co., ltd", etc. if there are simple ones available. There is no rule on here that every article has to conform to the very exact logo used on the company's website. Specially for airports, it's a pretty common practice to use only the ones specific to the airport itself when possible; for example,
Kuala Lumpur Int'l,
Bangkok Suvarnabhumi,
Beijing Capital,
Guangzhou Baiyun, etc. differ from their own official websites. There is nothing misleading about using the one that is currently on the article. Instead of edit warring like you have been doing, you need to discuss your changes appropriately. ɴᴋᴏɴ21❯❯❯talk14:30, 20 March 2024 (UTC)reply
That Facebook page is 5 years old, and the other two pages don't have an indication of when they were last updated. What do you have that's verifiably current? --
SarekOfVulcan (talk)15:05, 20 March 2024 (UTC)reply
As far as I'm aware, Skytrax updates their ratings every year, with the last release on March 15, 2023. Nonetheless, I don't quite see why the airport's management group should be used. Changi Airport Group manages its website and social media accounts so it would make sense to use their logo in those cases, but for Wikipedia,
File:Changi Airport logo.svg is simply fine. ɴᴋᴏɴ21❯❯❯talk15:25, 20 March 2024 (UTC)reply
The
non-group (Changi Airport Singapore) logo was introduced in May 2010,
time travel back to end of May 2010 shows the website having this logo. It wasn't until
middle of September 2019 where the
group (Changi Airport Group) logo replaced the non-group logo near the official opening of
Jewel Changi Airport. This also extends beyond online usage, such as real-life promotional materials with the final usage for non-group log depicts in
January 2019, and
recent images depicts the group logo. As for their media's releases usages that has logos, the final usage for non-group logo was in
June 2019. The first appearance of group logo was in
November 2019 after the official opening of Jewel. The only evidence I could find of the non-group logo still being used was video footage uploaded in 2023 by YouTuber showing how to self check in where the machine features the logo (whether or not it's engraved is unclear), for example
this at 0:13 in Terminal 4 or
this from the start in Terminal 1. Is it however unclear if the recently reopened Terminal 2 which features new machines uses the non-group logo or group logo, I would assumed that it is the latter. —Paper9oll(
🔔 •
📝)16:50, 20 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Then I don't think that using the non-group logo is of any concerns since the machines that is facing the passengers uses that logo. —Paper9oll(
🔔 •
📝)06:51, 21 March 2024 (UTC)reply
@
SarekOfVulcan Fyi, it does seem like the socking are slowly coming back since the full-protection has expired. Maybe consider semi-protection. I would assume/believe that there is some sort of consensus judging from the comments and given that the thread has essentially become stale. —Paper9oll(
🔔 •
📝)14:39, 26 March 2024 (UTC)reply
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
The newly released 2024 Skytrax World Airport Award has now put Singapore Changi at the World’s Second Best Airport behind Doha Hamad Airport in Qatar. (It is not “currently holding” the title anymore)