![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Seems like a copy or lift off Bend It Like Beckham in terms of the key story plot, yet seems to avoid similarities by using the sport of hockey and having the coach a muslim rather than angio as in Bend It like beckham—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 65.69.188.137 ( talk • contribs) 19:02, 3 October 2006.
Wow everything changed but then also inspired by bend it like. I gues Bend it was inspired by Lagan or etc —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 203.197.96.50 ( talk) 08:28, August 21, 2007 (UTC)
I was thinking 'Mighty Ducks'. But I haven't seen the movie. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.161.175.87 ( talk) 07:34, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
Why is there a lame (and mis-spelt) comment at the end of the article? Seems like some intellectually challenged vandal managed to edit the page. Someone with the rights, kindly edit these unwarranted comments.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 59.95.175.124 ( talk • contribs) 12:14, 12 August 2007.
Cast: Shahrukh Khan as Kabir Khan
The Team: Sagarika Ghatge as Preeti Sabarwal Chitrashi Rawat as Komal Chautala Shilpa Shukla as Bindia Naik Vidya Malavade as Vidya Sharma Tanya Abrol as Balbir Kaur Anaitha Nair as Aliya Bose Shubhi Mehta as Gunjan Lakhani Seema Azmi as Rani Dispotta Nisha Nair as Soimoi Kerketa Sandia Furtado as Nethra Reddy Arya Menon as Gul Iqbal Masochon V. Zimik as Molly Zimik Kimi Laldawla as Mary Ralte Kimberly Miranda as Rachna Prasad Nichola Sequeira as Nichola Sequeira Raynia Mascarenhas as Raynia Fernandes
Also Starring:
Aanjjan Srivastav Javed Khan Vibha Chibber Mohit Chauhan Nakul Vaid Joyoshree Arora Vivaan Bhathena—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 59.95.175.124 ( talk • contribs) 12:19, 12 August 2007.
I don't agree with the reviews of Nokia BTS group. Arnab.here 12:15, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 17:36, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
In the "Box Office" section, one unclosed <REF> tag took the rest of the article out. Both "References" and "External links" disappeared.
Mori Riyo (
talk)
01:09, 20 November 2007 (UTC) !!!!
Image:ChakDeCover.GIF is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 19:22, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
Please someone clean up synopsis. After the paragraph "With the shootout," the story is written again.. combine these or remove one... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mashsworld ( talk • contribs) 16:44, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
Please do not add irrlevant links. There must have been thousand films dealing with Indian female athletes. In film articles, we don't cite in the See Also section films that deal with the same topic. Or maybe you wanna add also all the films starring Shahrukh Khan? All the films won Filmfare Awards? All the films with no heroines? Maybe you also wanna add all the Indian cross-border romances to Veer-Zaara's see also section?
We can cite films with a similar achievement or whatever, but not the same topic. There were, there are, and there will always be films dealing with the same topic, or in this case, Indian female athletes. Shahid • Talk2me 18:53, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
(discussion copied from user talk page to open up to other editors)
The respective film is alleged to be inspired by the aforesaid film. Stop reverting it, an article has to be free of POV. buzz 18 is a reliable source it is a part of media network like CNN-IBN. If you have any doubts go through the cited source and read the full article.
I have changed the usage of words in the sentence(added alleged) to make it more precise, Plz. stop ruining the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by The Dark Wizard ( talk • contribs) 17:40, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
The pictures from the page have also be taken off, as they didn't have any direct relation with the subject. If we can find a picture of Shahrukh(or any other crew member) during an event related to the film or a movie still, that can be used in the article. Thank you.- The Dark Wizard ( talk) 18:11, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
The picture of the Billie Award has been deleted, as it is just a picture of the award, not a picture related to to the film. Its just like having a picture of Oscar in the page of Lagaan. The Dark Wizard • Talk2me 16:32, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
I removed the current English translation for the title ("Come On India") for a few reasons. There are a few possible translations for the title, some literal, others figurative. "Come On India" is a literal translation but I would suggest that it is not the best in terms of the thematic points of the film (Go for it India, for example, captures the meaning in a better way). The problem with offering an English translation lies in WP:OR as well - unless a film was released with the translated title, anything we offer could be OR.
A better solution would be to create a section with references that offer some of the possible translations. Anyone want to take this on? - Classicfilms ( talk) 16:16, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
A few members of Wikipedia:WikiProject Film/Indian cinema task force have organized into a committee to develop this article. Our goal is a future FAC - This link offers an overview of the expectations for an FAC
We also need to follow this style guide when developing the article:
Here is the current team. Please feel free to add your name if you are interested in working on an area of the article with us. - Classicfilms ( talk) 02:15, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
We have established a brainstorming page here: User:Classicfilms/Drafts
Okay here goes. Now, this article's main aim right now is to be pushed for the FAC. An unwritten rule for the FAC is that the article should have a beautiful appearance. It should look neat, organized and strictly without redlinks. Importantly, no photo or template must go out of a particular section and occupy the next section's space. This is important, as any interfering template automatically gives the article an ugly appearance at that spot.
Which brings me to the infobox : the infobox is too big. I can understand that this is due to the listing of the 16 Chak De! Girls, but I'm afraid that the infobox is entering into the Plot section and really giving the area a messy look. Now, there are two solutions to this :-
I leave it to consensus to see which idea is adopted. Cheers! ~*~ Ankit Bhatt~*~ 13:42, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
Alright, and thanks guys :) ~*~ Ankit Bhatt~*~ 17:00, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
The article requires certain stuff. First, I am going to redo the current Background and Development sections. The sections are wrongly named and the content is wrongly placed. Additionally, it will be better to remove the quote template and replace it with Rquote, as in Ra.One. A new Filming section will come up (though it will, problematically, be small).
A major missing part is there in the film - a "Casting" section. Generally i would recommend putting any casting info into the Cast list itself (again, refer Ra.One) but this film is an exception due to the 16 girls. Hence, a separate "Casting" sections would be required under the Production section to explain how the girls were cast, when and how SRK was cast etc. I hope Classicfilms and Meryam can do the needful regarding obtaining the information. Any further changes will be made later.
A note - this article will not reach FA status quickly. First we should clean up the article to the best of our ability, then go for a Peer Review (where many other issues can come up) and only then will the article be ready for the FAR. Regards, ~*~ Ankit Bhatt~*~ 17:48, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
Kudos to both of you for your hard work - I like all of the suggested changes and am impressed Meryam with the time and energy you put into the combined casting/filming section. While an FAC is a future goal, let's focus right now on the small things, what we can do bit by bit to improve this article. I tweaked the plot and added character names. Tomorrow, Meryam, I'll go through your casting section - so if you have a chance to read through the paragraph again today and make any tweaks that would be great. I think the next step is to start the large task of combing through all of our sources and figuring out what kind of material they offer, perhaps creating a list of clusters to develop into possible sections. I'll also at some point go through sources in the article to see if there is material we can use for other topics. Good work gang, keep it up! More tomorrow. - Classicfilms ( talk) 17:40, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
Hey all, I have to take a short wiki-break but I'll be back soon - I am calling some of the copy editing volunteers to ask for a wiki-edit. Also one of the issues with the article regards sources - there is on my talk page a link to a draft page with a number of URLs - we need some resourceful people to go through the links and organize topics. Improvements so far look great - let's keep it up. See you all soon - Classicfilms ( talk) 17:03, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: No move of the page( non-admin closure) jcc ( tea and biscuits) 11:15, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Chak De! India →
Chakde! India – Some sources say "Chak De", some say "Chakde". Can any Indian give any insight into which it's more likely to be? IMDB says Chakde
[1], as does Amazon
[2]. So does this Times of India review
[3]. There are lots of other sources that also say Chakde. On the poster/cover CHAK and DE are in different colors, but are right next to each other like they are one word. Thoughts?
Film Fan
22:10, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 4 external links on
Chak De! India. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 03:06, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
Need help Divyepareek007 ( talk) 08:36, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
![]() | You used the {{
Help me}} tag but did not ask a question. Please write out your question and replace the {{
Help me}} tag when you are done, and someone will be along to help. Alternatively, you can ask your question at the
Teahouse, the
help desk, or join
Wikipedia's Live Help
IRC channel to get real-time assistance. Click
here for instant access to the channel. |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Chak De! India. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:24, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
More: [5] [6] Shahid • Talk2me 14:12, 30 July 2021 (UTC)