This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to
rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion. See also:
WikiProject Trains to do list and the
Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article has been
automatically rated by a
bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
Not sure yet, but it's certainly possible that BOTH have been true at different times. In cases like that, what do we do? I lean towards listing in just class 1 in that case.
—Morven 19:56, Nov 19, 2004 (UTC)
Well, the nature of Class 1 means that at some point those railroads were Class 2. Likewise with Class 2 vs. 3. I would agree that the railroad should be listed on the highest class rating that it has qualified for.
slambo 20:50, Nov 19, 2004 (UTC)
There's very detailed info from the 19th Century but nothing from the 1920s until CN sold the line in 1995. There should be something atleast about dieselization, the GT Corporation or shipping conections.
173.110.59.190 (
talk)
01:50, 23 April 2012 (UTC)reply