This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
higher education,
universities, and
colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the
discussion, and see the project's
article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject. It may require cleanup to comply with Wikipedia's content policies, particularly neutral point of view. Please discuss further on the talk page. (June 2012)
I work at CSLA. I've cleaned up the article to the best of my ability and attempted to maintain a neutral tone.
Are there any specific instances in the article that need further neutrality revisions?
Furthermore, the official title of our center keeps getting changed on the main page, citing copyright issues as a reason. How can I maintain our official title without violating the Wikipedia ::rules, keeping in mind that I control the official CSLA page?
I accidentally removed the title of the center, I'd meant to remove a section that was blatant copy-and-paste copyright violation. CSLA pages are copyrighted and link to
this copyright notice, so they cannot be used on Wikipedia. If you copied other sections, please remove them- making "thesaurus edits" does not fix copyright issues. You can read
Wikipedia:Copyright violations and
Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for much more information.
The editing tag that remains is about the
conflict of interest between the article creator and the content of the article. You state you control the CSLA page, so it certainly applies. Please read through the COI guidelines for more information; generally, it's very hard to write a neutral article when you are closely connected.
tedder (
talk)
19:55, 20 June 2012 (UTC)reply
Currently looking to get permission from LMU to use the text from our page. If anything has to be deleted it can be restored upon receiving clearance. I have read through the COI and Copyright pages in addition to any other relevant policy pages. I will add a disclaimer stating my affiliation to my talk page and contribute information to the CSLA page and other related pages from the talk page only.
I have just modified one external link on
Center for the Study of Los Angeles. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.