From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Page-specific consensus
- There is consensus to include the BBC's description of the CSP as "not very highly respected" in the article lead. (
RfC, June 2016,
July 2017)
- There is consensus to opt for a syntax similar to "version B" in the following RFC to avoid a "too disparaging" lead. (
RfC, Dec 2016,
Jan 2017)
- The "Controversy" section should include that the Center has been criticized for propagating conspiracy theories. (
Feb 2017,
Feb 2017)
- The Southern Poverty Law Center is a
reliable source for factual information on Wikipedia. (
June 2018,
WP:SPLC)
