![]() | Center for Class Action Fairness was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Delisted good article |
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Grapple X ( talk • contribs • count) 02:38, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
Ah well spotted. I'll try to sort that out shortly.
Howz that, I think I've got em all. If not can you address those outstanding which are problematic? ♦ Dr. Blofeld 08:09, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
![]() | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. The request was not specific enough. You may consider leaving your comments on the Talk page or escalating significant issues to the conflict of interest noticeboard. |
Might someone update this wildly out of date article? This American Lawyer profile has more up to date statistics and accounts of more important victories than the ones listed here; Ars Technica wrote a nice piece about CCAF, too. We won the Dewey case mentioned in the last paragraph. Reuters; NJLJ; Forbes.
If some is more ambitious than that, there is a large list of sources at http://tedfrank.com/press, including WSJ ( reprinted here); Forbes; Litigation Daily; Corporate Counsel; Wall Street Journal; Legal Intelligencer; Forbes; Forbes; WSJ; ABA Journal; Fortune; Reuters; Litigation Daily; Wall Street Journal.
Many thanks. Theodore H. Frank ( talk) 16:22, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
This article focuses too much on CCAF-promotional material; this may need to be reevaluated in the light of how CCAF is portrayed in the sources. The three quoteboxes quoting Ted Frank at length also seem egregious. RJaguar3 | u | t 02:42, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
What does that mean? The no-longer-accessible article may say that, but the first reference only says that it was initially funded by Donors Trust. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 16:10, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Center for Class Action Fairness. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:20, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
A procedural delist as the article is now a redirect. AIRcorn (talk) 08:52, 20 April 2018 (UTC)