![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Google Books to the rescue: [1] - Pete 03:19, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
Seems rather pro-Cayuse violence. Whoever wrote this is less interested in the unbias facts of history than they are about making a statement about the ethics of the Oregon trail. Such passion is better left for private websites. —Preceding unsigned comment added by CapitolHistory ( talk • contribs) 02:36, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
Part of the last paragraph doesn't really seem encyclopedic, more of a forward looking statement. I don't think it fits, so I removed it as it was not cited and provided no real information besides a debate on how much is recorded and a hopeful statement. TheForgottenKing ( talk) 16:45, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Cayuse War. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:16, 1 August 2017 (UTC)