This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

A fact from Caproni Ca.60 appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 6 February 2015 ( check views). The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that the Caproni Ca.60 Transaereo eight-engine, nine-wing flying boat prototype was intended to become a 100-passenger transatlantic airliner, but crashed on its second flight? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2015/February. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Caproni Ca.60.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Aviation: Aircraft This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion met This article is supported by the aircraft project. This article contains a translation of Caproni Ca.60 Transaereo from it.wikipedia. ( 641616939 et seq.)

Is the plane still at the bottom of the lake or was it raised and scrapped? -- Ragemanchoo ( talk) 06:00, 18 January 2008 (UTC) reply

• According to a comment on youtube page War I Aero magazine featured a two-part article by Gregory Alegi on the history and surviving bits and pieces of this aircraft in issues #193 (Aug. 2006) and #194 (Nov. 2006). Pavel Vozenilek ( talk) 20:09, 8 December 2008 (UTC) reply
  • Actually the article is mostly wrong. The Ca-60 didn't sink, its wreck floated on the top. The remains were destroyed in a fire of unknown origin.-- 69.155.113.22 ( talk) 21:39, 16 April 2009 (UTC) reply
  • According to a book about the world's worst aircraft, Caproni had the wreckage towed to shore and announced that he would rebuild. That night il Capronissimo mysteriously burned to ashes. J S Ayer ( talk) 14:24, 5 March 2011 (UTC) reply

According to some sources the pilots walked away unscathed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.149.152.145 ( talk) 20:28, 11 May 2008 (UTC) reply

Yes, the test pilot crawled out of the wreckage unscathed.
WilliamBrain (
talk) 
23:53, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
reply

Isn't it a bit far fetched to state a range of 660 km, when the plane crashed almost immediately after take-off on its first test flight. One ought to put a "theoretical" mark to that statement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thandruin ( talk • contribs) 20:47, 22 October 2012 (UTC) reply

According to the italian article of the wikipedia, the aircraft made two flights, not one, and never burnt.

Translated with google translate: " The damage that the aircraft had suffered in the crash were very serious , but the rear two-thirds of the fuselage and wings of the complex remained almost intact. However, the Transaereo had to be towed to shore from the point , in the middle of the lake, which had crashed . In the course of the journey (it was pulled by a boat , perhaps, was the same whose trail had interfered with the take-off ) the aircraft suffered further damage : the fuselage embarked plenty of water and ended up largely submerged , and also the two groups of hind wings are damaged , curl leaves and ending up partially in the water. The ability to repair the plane was rather remote , and after the incident had remained usable only metal parts and engines , and it was necessary to rebuild almost all parts in wood. [22] The cost of repairing the aircraft, according to the estimation of Caproni same , it would be about a third of what was the cost for the construction of the prototype, but it was not certain that the company's resources were sufficient for this . After an initial moment of despair , however, already Caproni March 6 he began to think about the changes to the project to be able to carry on ; convinced that the path taken was the right one to the civil air transport on a large scale , he decided to build a model 1:4 scale to continue his studies . [22] " — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.174.192.20 ( talk) 11:49, 29 December 2013 (UTC) reply

Hello everybody! Just to inform you that I'm working on a translation of the Italian Wikipedia article on the Caproni Ca.60 in my sandbox. It's probably going to take a while before I finish, but I guess there's no hurry. Cheers, -- M.L.Watts _{Watts up?} 23:58, 6 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Yay! I'm done! I'm opening a thread at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aircraft to ask somebody to proofread the article (I'm not an English native speaker...) -- M.L.Watts _{Watts up?} 19:38, 8 January 2015 (UTC) reply