![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
the field is so named after the fisherman who found it, apparently he kept on getting oil etc in his nets when fishing that area and repeatably told PEMEX about it who refused to believe him until he took a few of them out in his boat, i'll see if i can find a ref for it. Philbentley 17:32, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
This article: http://www.gasandoil.com/goc/frame_ntl_news.htm talks about the decline of this oil field. Agre22 ( talk) 12:41, 1 January 2009 (UTC)agre22 I read also on the site http://www.gasandoil.com/goc/frame_ntl_news.htm today, that only with injection of CO2, this oil field will become big again, but Pemex doesn't knows where to find so much CO2 as needed. I'll would suggest to use CO2 from ethanol production. For one liter of ethanol, we must produce about one kilo of CO2. Agre22 ( talk) 20:37, 31 December 2009 (UTC)agre22
A graph or chart showing the rate of decline would be useful for this article. Is anyone up to it. - Shiftchange ( talk) 23:10, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Cantarell Field. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:54, 14 November 2016 (UTC)