This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Camulodunum article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
Who calls it Camulodumum (with an 'm' rather than an 'n')? I've never heard that before. Citation please!
-- Tom Anderson 2007-05-08 18:03 +0100 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 128.40.81.27 ( talk) 17:04, 8 May 2007 (UTC).
The fact that this is almost certainly the source of the name " Camelot" seem to beg mention here. — SMcCandlish [ talk] [ cont] ‹(-¿-)› 06:44, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
Hello. I've rewritten much of the article, complete with references, over the past few days to try and give more info on the town during its high point and flesh out its history. For such an important part of Britain's Roman past, the old article was very scanty and seemed to imply that the town ended with Boudica, and then turned into Camelot...
Please add more info if you can and more pictures!
Razumukhin ( talk) 21:16, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
This major find surely needs a mention: http://www.thecolchesterarchaeologist.co.uk/?p=14844 John a s ( talk) 23:13, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
Thanks! I look forward to seeing the treasure in a museum one day. John a s ( talk) 21:52, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
In the "walls" section you mention that a venus statuette was found in 1872-73 that may have been part of the temples. Was it by any chance THIS statuette found in 1870, and now at the British Museum? http://www.britishmuseum.org/research/collection_online/collection_object_details.aspx?objectId=1394346&partId=1&searchText=diadem&images=true&object=20526&subject=54324&page=1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Florimell1919 ( talk • contribs) 06:36, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Camulodunum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:35, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Camulodunum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.cat.essex.ac.uk/reports/CAR-report-0008When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:32, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
The coin image entitled 'Coin of the Trinovantes minted at Camulodunon' may have an incomplete and potentially misleading caption. The coin bears the letters CVN which is the usual shorthand for King Cunobelin. This, in turn, means that the coin would not belong to the early Trinovantes period of Camulodunon (25-10 BC) as appears implied by the article text at this point, but to Cunobelin's reign (c. AD 9-40). A numismatist should check this out, and if necessary, clarify it with an unambiguous caption. Klumpenburg ( talk) 18:00, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
jhjhfee Troopersho ( talk) 17:37, 24 April 2023 (UTC)