Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Khanassassin ( talk · contribs) 16:26, 15 February 2012 (UTC) reply

I'll be reviewing the article Things that need to be done:

• Campaign:
  • should be a subsection to gameplay
    • No, it should be treated as a plot/synopsis section- SCB '92 ( talk) 13:28, 20 February 2012 (UTC) reply
      • In theCoD4 article, the campaign is a sub-section to gameplay, and Synopisis contains Plot and Setting and Characters. So, I'm correct. -- Khanassassin ☪ 13:56, 20 February 2012 (UTC) reply
        • Plot and gameplay are most commonly separate. And in this case there is no editorial reason to put "campaign" as a subsection. Just because it works better for CoD 4, doesn't mean it must be done that way here too. —   HELLKNOWZ  ▎ TALK 15:21, 20 February 2012 (UTC) reply

• So, since both of you, Mr. '92 and Mr. Hell think it's not necessary, it's a pass.

**it is almost completly unreferenced

• • • It's generally accepted that since a work's plot sections are referencing the work itself, plot citations aren't necessary; see the plot subsection in the Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare article (an FA)- SCB '92 ( talk) 13:28, 20 February 2012 (UTC) reply
      • They are not necessary but are highly recommended; atleast one in each paragraph (in-game references are often used). -- Khanassassin ☪ 13:56, 20 February 2012 (UTC) reply
        • Where is it highly recommended? Most recent VG discussion on this was here and it's generally accepted that plot does not require citations if it isn't contentious. Not even for FA, let alone GA. —   HELLKNOWZ  ▎ TALK 15:21, 20 February 2012 (UTC) reply
          • Allright, allright -- Khanassassin ☪ 15:54, 20 February 2012 (UTC) reply