This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the
project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
U.S. state of Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the
project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This
edit request by an editor with a
conflict of interest was declined. The changes suggested removing content that is well-cited or where sources exist.
At the end of the page, I request that the following be deleted:
"A few recently released reports include:" and the bulleted list that follows it.
The list is out of date and even if refreshed would soon be out of date again. It should be deleted.
I do NOT propose deleting section "Research" nor its first sentence: "CNA research covers a variety of topics including national defense, education, energy, water and climate, air traffic management, and safety and security." This does not need to be deleted as it is not out of date and could be expanded upon by someone later.
I am on the staff of CNA and am therefore requesting this edit instead of making it myself.
Dsnoozer (
talk)
21:36, 10 January 2018 (UTC)reply
My reading of
Wikipedia:Notability suggests that
WP:NOTTEMPORARY is irrelevant to this discussion. To quote that page: “notability is a test used by editors to decide whether a given topic warrants its own article” and “The notability guidelines do not apply to contents of articles or lists.” The request was for the deletion of content, a list inside an article. Perhaps the more relevant guideline is
Wikipedia:Content_removal, which says that for content that qualifies as “not significantly relevant” ... “move the content to the Talk page with a note explaining why you have relocated it.” This content is a random list of reports over a 21-month period in 2014 and 2015. As time goes on, it becomes increasingly irrelevant and (since it is described on the page as "recent reports") inaccurate. If other editors think it would be more appropriate to follow Wikipedia's suggestion that irrelevant content be moved to the talk page, I would support that move.
Dsnoozer (
talk)
15:04, 11 January 2018 (UTC)reply
I agree with dsnoozer. The content is irrelevant, and there is nothing about the content that suggests the editor is trying to remove the content because of a bias. The content is not unflattering, it’s just irrelevant.
Hickswa (
talk)
19:10, 24 February 2018 (UTC) —
Hickswa (
talk •
contribs) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic. reply
I agree with dsnoozer, as well. There's no reason to list what this group has published as none of the publications are noteworthy, nor are they even described. Chris Troutman (
talk)19:32, 24 February 2018 (UTC)reply
I also agree with dsnoozer. Since there is a consensus of four who agree that it should be deleted. I am moving it to the Talk page.
Sophie33js (
talk)
19:00, 31 May 2018 (UTC)reply
Research
CNA research covers a variety of topics including national defense, education, energy, water and climate, air traffic management, and safety and security. A few recently released reports include:
Appalachia Rising: A Review of Education Research (September 2015)[3][4]
North Korea's Provocation and Escalation Calculus: Dealing with the Kim Jong-un Regime (August 2015)[5]
The Potential Environmental Impacts of Fracking in the Delaware River Basin (August 2015)[6][7][8]
National Security and the Accelerating Risks of Climate Change (May 2014)[9][10]
In February 2014, CNA released an "Independent Assessment of the Afghan National Security Forces." This assessment, tasked by the United States Congress, outlines the likely security environment for
Afghanistan over the next decade as well as an overview of the
Afghan National Security Forces capabilities.[11][12]
References
^Anita Hattiangadi; Lewis G. Lee; Robert Shuford; Aline Quester (November 17, 2015),
Retirement Choice 2015(PDF), CNA. {{
citation}}: Unknown parameter |last-author-amp= ignored (|name-list-style= suggested) (
help)
The NRSAND-augmented effort was hosted by
Unisys in
Saint Paul, Minnesota. Feedback from this experiment was to help specify
Aegis Combat System performance metrics.
USS Vincennes (CG-49) on 3-July-1988 showed NTDS simulation feedback was ineffective or prior lessons learned were ignored.
VADM
David C. Richardson (admiral) advocated the fusion of current intelligence with current operations during his tour as Deputy
Commander, Pacific Fleet (1970-1972). Prototype NRSAND 14-1 (Intel) and 14-2 (Ops) units pioneered a
WWMCCS computer-assisted
Decision support system (DSS) merging both Operational Readiness (C321) and Sea Surveillance (C322).
During July 1986, the Coronado was relieved as
Sixth Fleet command ship and ordered to
Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, to become the command ship for Commander, U.S. 3rd Fleet.
On 26 November 1986, Commander, Third Fleet shifted his flag from his headquarters ashore to resume status as an afloat commander for the first time since World War II, aboard USS Coronado (AGF-11).