![]() | CKMI-DT has been listed as one of the
Media and drama good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: August 19, 2023. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | A fact from CKMI-DT appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 1 October 2023 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
In the CKMI-TV-1 page, Blueboy96 inserted the claim that CKMI was carried on cable in Montreal during its CBC affiliation, a claim that is definitely false. Each time I deleted this information, Blueboy96 re-inserted this false information.
Blueboy96, how did you find out that CKMI was carried on cable in Montreal before it became Global?
SuperJSP ( talk) 00:19, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on CKMI-DT. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:38, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on CKMI-DT. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:05, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Lightburst ( talk · contribs) 22:57, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
The other citations check out, and the nominator has done a very good job of citing the article without close WP:CLOP. I have spot checked many references and I checked the Earwig score. The nominator has done an excellent job of interpreting references and the prose is very accessible. The extensive use of newspapers as reliable sources is a credit to the nominator. I have rarely seen so many newspapers used in an article. I did see the use of a tweet in the article with citation 59, and Twitter is red in our Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources, but I consider it fine because it is backed up by another reliable source.
The infobox is filled in and provides relevant information. The tables at the bottom of the article are helpful. The external links and navigation templates are all very useful and they follow our manual of style for WP:LAYOUT. The use of a quote box appears to be ok, I cannot find anything in our manual of style to say that a block-quote should be treated another way. Lightburst ( talk) 15:30, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
The result was: promoted by
AirshipJungleman29
talk
15:23, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by Sammi Brie ( talk). Self-nominated at 17:00, 19 August 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/CKMI-DT; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.