This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Greek history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Turkey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Turkey and
related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TurkeyWikipedia:WikiProject TurkeyTemplate:WikiProject TurkeyTurkey articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us
assess and improve articles to
good and
1.0 standards, or visit the
wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
"It was also seen as a departure from ancient church tradition, of which there was a written record opposing religious images."
This is very POV and unsupported. In fact, there is much evidence to the contrary being that their are images of Christ dating back to 70 AD. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
70.234.181.54 (
talk)
04:48, 30 June 2008 (UTC)reply
That is rather POV, and there is much evidence to the contrary. Not only is there that church discovered from 70 AD containing images, but their are quotes from St. Basil and others on iconography. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
70.234.161.40 (
talk)
18:44, 26 July 2008 (UTC)reply
Yes, that was the POV of the Iconoclasts, which has to be reported here. They were not without evidence on their side. St Basil is not from the early church.
Johnbod (
talk)
11:56, 27 September 2008 (UTC)reply
Question
How is it possible that an article of this nature should not at least mention the Jewish prohibition against religious images of any kind? While not controlling by any stretch of the imagination, one must wonder whether the ancient Byzantines at least had nominal contact with Jewish thought and projected that on to then current iconography. That would also help explain the deep schism between Italians and Greeks, who had a long and distinguished career creating religious iconography and sculpture, and the Jews who ritually forbade it. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Bg53 90069 (
talk •
contribs)
08:41, 20 August 2013 (UTC)reply
Really an issue in an earlier period, see
Aniconism in Christianity. The
Dura Europos synagogue actually shows Jewish and Christian attitudes to sacred art pretty close in the 3rd century. In so far as "semitic aniconism" is regarded as a factor in Byzantine iconoclasm, it is generally considered to have been the Islamic version that was relevant.
Johnbod (
talk)
14:04, 20 August 2013 (UTC)reply
Awful introduction
This article doesn't even state what iconoclasm is, when that should be the first thing the article does. It just jumps straight into specifics. In fact, the entire article could do with restructuring.
92.10.193.29 (
talk)
04:10, 25 September 2008 (UTC)reply
The intro still reads a bit choppy, with Haldon's challenge upfront, then the 4th paragraph still explaining things. If you trim/streamline it a little may help. I still had a hard time grasping the connections in one reading.
History2007 (
talk)
19:46, 7 April 2013 (UTC)reply
Yes, the Haldon stuff was all added, too prominently, by a fan, which there was discussion about at the time, & things still need sorting.
Johnbod (
talk)
02:11, 8 April 2013 (UTC)reply
Right, that was what I thought too. So perhaps the Haldon item should just move to the 4th parag and the rest get trimmed. And actually per
WP:LEDE Haldon can not just sit there in the lede if not explained in the body, and not clear how he challenged mainstream ideas anyway.
History2007 (
talk)
00:27, 9 April 2013 (UTC)reply
I've read some reviews of B&H (should have seen the original but the library booking system was permanently temporarily unavailable) & actually a) they get far from universal praise, and b) they seem to actually stress the push from the top in the Imperial Court, & downplay any wider movement, rather contrary to what the fan said. "Basixc assumptions" seem unrocked in fact. Not sure what to do in the absence of better info on them, but I can add from the various sources I do have.
Johnbod (
talk)
02:35, 11 May 2013 (UTC)reply
Sorry, but I disagree with where this has gone. Yes we could define Iconoclasm, but NO, I would not have a whole long paragraph defining related words etc.
IceDragon64 (
talk)
21:35, 21 October 2017 (UTC)reply
Eastern Church/Western Church Mix-Up
Someone correct me if I am wrong, but I think the Eastern and Western Church are confused in the intro of this page. The Eastern Church today (the Orthodox Church) still uses images of Christ and the saints to this day in worship, while most Western churches don't. So why is the Eastern Church being shown as the iconoclasts and the Western Church as the defenders of icons, when it is clearly the other way around today?
Thanks! — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Bajjer21 (
talk •
contribs)
15:22, 24 September 2015 (UTC)reply
Hi, I have added couple of sentences to try and clear up a little bit of the paragraphs. I've read Byzantium by John Julius Norwich and added a bit saying that Leo III could have been influenced by Islamic beliefs and practises. I've also added a sentence saying that it was Leo III who said that icons were against Mosaic Law.
HistoryBud (
talk)
11:00, 12 October 2019 (UTC)reply
Hi
HistoryBud, thanks for your edits to the article – good to see some of those citation needed tags being dealt with. The article is certainly better off now and more balanced. I didn't realise that 'Muslim territories became havens for iconophile refugees', a very interesting point.
Richard Nevell (
talk)
15:29, 4 November 2019 (UTC)reply
Wiki Education assignment: The Destruction of Images
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 17 January 2024 and 29 April 2024. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Albertinap (
article contribs).