This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello, I have changed this article and hope it meets the guidelines you have shared with me. Thanks. sanhealy Hi, Any feedback would be welcomed. I'm hoping it's acceptable for publishing now. thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 32.97.110.142 ( talk) 23:36, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
Hello, I have changed this article to meet the standards and requirements setout in Wikipedia. Thanks.
User:Sanhealy has proposed that this article be renamed. Does anyone object to the new name? I'll recommend one change; education and partnerships need to be lower-case according to the Wikipedia:Manual of style. If anyone responds here, please remember to sign your comment by appending four tildes to your comment (~) before pressing 'Save page.' This will expand into your name and the date. EdJohnston ( talk) 15:16, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
I agree that the name should be changed to Business-education partnerships according to the Wikipedia:Manual of style. Sanhealy ( talk) 16:43, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
Although at this point in time I have added only Canadian examples of partnerships, I'm anticipating that this site applies to anywhere in the world and others who contribute to the site can add examples from their own geographic locations. Business-education partnerships are world-wide and often the two parties are from different parts of the world. I'll add some international examples to the current listing to give it that international flavour. Others can expand on them if they so desire. Also, I have cited some US references from the literature review I did.-- Sanhealy ( talk) 17:10, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
Regarding cluttering up the edit history - I'll be using the 'show preview' when editing any article. Thanks.-- Sanhealy ( talk) 17:10, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
I'm not sure what you mean by your last statement, "after the content settles down". Please expand on. Thanks.-- Sanhealy ( talk) 14:38, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
I have found a few categories relevant to this topic and added them to the bottom of this article. I have done considerable rewriting to address the issues tagged for cleanup, essay and tone. I have also provided a 'global' perspective on the topic also. -- Sanhealy ( talk) 17:34, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
I have toned down the authoritative advice in this article and incorporated a neutral tone where applicable. I have also added a section on the "growing disenchantment of business and industry", although I have not found much literature on the subject, it will certainly be a starting point for additional input from others. I'm hoping that this article is ready for a clean bill as I do have a deadline to meet of Feb 29th, to have this assignment completed. Your feedback is much appreciated. -- Sanhealy ( talk) 21:17, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
We are to learn about Wikipedia and the Wikipedia community by contributing to the English edition of the encyclopedia. We have been asked to create a new Wikipedia article on any topic or expand an existing "stub" article. Our article should contain approximately 1000-1500 words and we have the option of creating several smaller articles instead of one large one. We are allowed to choose any topic we wish within the spirit of the Wikipedia guidelines. Our professor has provided us with the qualities of a superior Wikipedia contribution.
I am enrolled in a course at the Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, "An Introduction to Knowledge Building". -- Sanhealy ( talk) 02:30, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
Will the two items essay-like and tone for February 2008 on this article be removed soon? -- Sanhealy ( talk) 19:43, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
Yes, I think you're right on this point. I have recently reviewed the literature and found a number of studies and articles that would present this perspective and will update the article and the resources section with these findings later today. Thanks. -- Sanhealy ( talk) 16:21, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Ed, I was wondering if you had a chance to review my updated posting. Thanks. Sandra Sanhealy ( talk) 03:43, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
Hello Ed, I've gone through and made the changes you have recommended. -- Sanhealy ( talk) 17:02, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
Yes, I think that would be not only interesting but feedback of any kind is always productive. Thanks. -- Sanhealy ( talk) 01:24, 26 March 2008 (UTC) So I've been waiting for feedback from this WikiProject. Have you requested they review my wiki? My course ends tomorrow and it would be great if someone could approve or provide some feedback. thanks. -- Sanhealy ( talk) 22:26, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Ed, I went through the references and added the specific ISBNs where applicable and other info to complete the reference. I'll take a look at citation templates. I'm not sure what they are but I'm willing to learn something new. Yes, this is OISE in Toronto and our class projects come to an end today. I could provide you with a list of wikipedia articles our class worked on but since today is our last day, I'm not sure the group work will continue. I can only speak for myself - and I do intend to take my to completion. I have also posted a note to Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Education this morning for feedback as you suggested.
Thanks, Sandra-- Sanhealy ( talk) 21:15, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
Hi Ed, Are you wanting me to look for feed back from another project? Our class is coming to a closure...our closure is today. There is no project and the students are moving on to other courses. Our communication has been most valuable and I will continue our communication to ensure that soon the banners on my contribution will eventually be removed. Thanks. Sandra.-- Sanhealy ( talk) 07:30, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Business-education partnerships. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/0000019b/80/14/d4/1f.pdf{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.hrsdc.gc.ca/en/cs/sp/hrsdc/edd/reports/1997-000341/eerpy.pdf{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.preal.org/Ing/Programas.asp?Id_Programa=17&Id_Seccion=35When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:06, 11 November 2016 (UTC)