This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Pokémon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
Pokémon universe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PokémonWikipedia:WikiProject PokémonTemplate:WikiProject PokémonPokémon articles
Can we get some pics of Mino in it's alternate colours? It would help the article more than just having a bit saying "pink version".
JQF23:19, 3 October 2006 (UTC)reply
Minomutchi has three different forms: the forest form, the sandy form, and the insulation form. How would one go about describing the forms in detail? Would they be placed in the Biological characteristics section like this:
It's not that we hate Serebii, rather it's that Serebii does not reveal its sources, failing
WP:RS. Besides, you also have to consider where every other fansite gets its info. -
Jeske(
v^_^v)00:12, 13 April 2007 (UTC)reply
Alright, so you say Serebii's a fansite and fansites aren't reliable sources, that's fine and all that. BUT, has it ever, even once, occurred to you that Nintendo has officially revealed names of Pokemon, attacks, and abilities, and EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM are the same as Serebii revealed them? On Pokemon.com for instance- Drapion was revealed there, a while after it was revealed by Serebii. The attacks Worry Seed, Last Resort, and Cross Poison were all revealed there as well, EXACTLY as Serebii reported them. Then there's Grotle, Torterra, Monferno, Infernape, Prinplup, Riolu, and Magnezone. All confirmed by the TCG, and ALL revealed by Serebii beforehand. Then there's Cranidos, Combee, Vespiquen, Mantyke, Electivire, Buizel, and Chatot, and many more, I'm sure. These were NOT mere guesses! Especially Vespiquen- who would've GUESSED a name including a kind of wasp that hardly any kids know of, and a deliberate misspelling of queen, even though the correct spelling wouldn't violate the 10-character limit. And then there's the abilities Sniper and Flower Gift. Both revealed by Serebii, both confirmed by Pokemon.com. Now, Serebii may be a fansite, but don't you agree that a website that reports so much accurate information should be deemed as slightly more credible than the average fansite???
Feats-O-Strength10:54, 16 April 2007 (UTC)reply
Not in this case, since Serebii doesn't say where it gets its information, as I stated above, meaning we can't independently verify anything they're saying. -
Jeske(
v^_^v)12:57, 16 April 2007 (UTC)reply
Where? IGN did, though, so I'll go change that. (Never did get around to it yesterday.) You also might want to read earlier comments so you don't duplicate things unnecessarily. –
mcy1008 (
talk)
20:20, 20 April 2007 (UTC)reply
the name burmy was confirmed in the pokemon D/P movie aired on cartoon network last night, when dawn and her pokedex saw one and called it a burmy.--
65.54.154.11711:24, 21 April 2007 (UTC)reply
I can't move it from Minowhatsit to Burmy, it wouldn't let me. So I just copied/pasted and some guy reverted it. What the hell am I supposed to do?
Toastypk14:14, 22 April 2007 (UTC)reply
I don't think Burmy is a contraction of "bagworm"
Where do the "u" and "y" come from then? And don't say its because the Japanese name was intentionally misspelled. Burmy is clearly a portmanteau, of what words I'm not sure anyone out of Nintendo is sure about.
My guess would be "worm" and "bushy" like a bushy beard or an actual bush, to represent the way Burmy's coat appears. —The preceding
unsigned comment was added by
68.4.221.28 (
talk)
05:11, 16 May 2007 (UTC).reply
Wow, real hostility towards the #1 POKEMON FANSITE ON THE INTERNET. I do believe that if something is the best, it doesn't have to give away where it's getting it's info, because other sites striving to be better could steal that info. Serebii.net has a good track record and should not be shunned. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Падший ангел (
talk •
contribs)