This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Pokémon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
Pokémon universe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PokémonWikipedia:WikiProject PokémonTemplate:WikiProject PokémonPokémon articles
I suspect that this romanization, like
Parrap, is
original research. That is, I have found absolutely no source to confirm either of these spellings as authentic, unlike
Lucario and
Manaphy which were confirmed by trademark filings and, in the former's case, various publications and merchandise.
Wonk61914:50, 4 March 2006 (UTC)reply
The names Buoisel and Parrap were not confirmed, but there's a 99% percent chance that these are the original names like Lucario and Manaphy, as these names are valid romanizations and make sense in reference to the Pokemon - Perappu = Parrapu (Parrot) and the "u" in the end is always an additive.
ErezR15:50, 4 March 2006 (UTC)reply
While those names may be logical ones, the official spellings may be slightly different (ex: Buoysel, Parrup). Therefore, until there are confirmed official romanizations, I suggest that these articles be left as Buizeru and Perappu.
Wonk61901:27, 5 March 2006 (UTC)reply
Like with
Parrap, I question the rationale behind the original deletion of this. The words "suspected hoax" were added to Parrap's page when it was re-created in the poorly-formatted deletion tags, but
this is an official Nintendo site that includes the image. --
HeroicJay08:54, 4 March 2006 (UTC)reply
It [the name] could still change. Look at what happened with Snubbull. It went through an entire mini-movie with the wrong name.
Almighty Rajah23:58, 25 June 2006 (UTC)AlmightyRajahreply
Dawn or Ash
I'm getting really annoyed as to who keep changing Ash catching Buizel to Dawn catching it. It's Ash who catches it already!
It is currently unknown who will catch it. All we know is that SOMEONE will be catching it, as it's with them in a trailer for the movie. Lets just change it to it will appear in whatever episode. This appears to be the only way without speculating. -
Sukecchi18:59, 12 May 2007 (UTC)reply
As Buoysel is confirmed to be #56 in the SHinou Pokédex, I have added it as #442 in the National Pokédex. However, I do realise that there may be some Kanto/Johto/Hoenn Pokémon before it, so feel free to change it.
Double Dash15:24, 11 August 2006 (UTC)reply
And I've removed it. We don't yet know that the Shinou Pokédex will continue from the end of the National one, or that the Nat'l dex will even appear in D&P. Please don't add supposition, even if it seems logical on the surface. -
A Man In Bl♟ck (
conspire |
past ops)
15:36, 11 August 2006 (UTC)reply
Buizel
I added something near the top about Buizel not being official yet. Hopefully that will cut down the number of changes and moves. Cipher(Yell)10:53, 27 January 2007 (UTC)reply
Also, according to the
Reliable sources guideline (but not policy):
Replicability—The conclusions of the source can be reached using the information available and there is no indication of gaps in the thinking or process of derivation. Essentially, this criterion asks if there are any leaps of faith in the source.
Declaration of sources—A source which is explicit about the data from which it derives its conclusions is more reliable than one which does not. Ideally, a source should describe the collection process and analysis method.
Confidentiality—Sources which are considered confidential by the originating publisher may hold uncertain authority. Given that the original cannot be used to validate the reference, these should be treated with caution.
Serebii hasn't made a conclusion that can be duplicated with the available information, and he hasn't declared his source(s). That makes his information sort of sketchy.—
M_C_Y_1008 (talk/contribs)
22:14, 28 January 2007 (UTC)reply
There's a little problem with your 9th movie idea- it hasn't been released in the U.S. yet. We haven't heard Buoysel's name in English yet, and although Serebii is reliable, it's still a fansite. So, we have to wait for April 3rd to come around for an official name. Hello211200:02, 30 January 2007 (UTC)reply
The fansite Psypokes.com does not listen to Serebii.net.
But is Psypoke reliable? No. Fansites are not official sources, do not invoke them for name changes. I have had to go through the crap with
Chatot; I can say from experience that it is hellaceous. Wait until it's officially announced by Nintendo, 9th movie or no. -
Jeske(
v^_^v)03:27, 3 February 2007 (UTC)reply
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Add # '''Support''' or # '''Oppose''' on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~. Please remember that this survey is
not a vote, and please provide an explanation for your recommendation.
Survey - in support of the move
Support. Putting the Japanese Romanization above an English name, even if it is later changed, is ridiculous. This wasn't controversial, and the "controversy" would have never been brought up if the redirect didn't have history.
'19:06, 21 February 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.