This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with
Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the
project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to
philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of
India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us
assess and improve articles to
good and
1.0 standards, or visit the
wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the
legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class.
BetacommandBot16:22, 9 November 2007 (UTC)reply
Article rewritten by Bhante Dhammika
As Bhante Dhammika, a renowned monk from the Theravada tradition, said his entries were formerly deleted here, I took the freedom to include his extensive work on the subject myself, with his permission. I just left the entry lines from the previous article here and replaced all the rest. So all credit for the content goes to him, all the blame for doing this to me.
Otaku00 (
talk)
17:43, 30 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Hi, I see that you found the text in the Sunday times. Nevertheless couldn't you have asked me first before calling it a "copyright infringement" publicly (which is, if you are wrong, illegal by itself, by the way) and removing it? I got it from Bhante Dhammika's website (blog) and from there it is pretty clear that he recommended it for Wiki but had no success in previously posting it himself and got tired of it - that's where I jumped in. Bhante is a Theravada monk. Still, I will inform him to give his official consent ...
http://sdhammika.blogspot.com/2016/06/buddhism-weddings-and-marriage.htmlOtaku00 (
talk)
03:36, 8 August 2016 (UTC)reply
I don't need to ask your permission first because you don't
own this article. Nowhere in that blog post does it release that text to the public, further wikipedia articles should use multiple
reliable sources and aren't simply places to republish single author's opinions.
Dharmalion76 (
talk)
16:51, 8 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Yes, you should ask first, as recommended in the Wiki guidelines. But that's beyond the point. You should be careful not to blame others of committing a crime (copyright infringement) because that in itself may constitute a crime (libel). The blog post has comments, and from there it becomes clear that the author has nothing against it and unsuccessfully tried to post articles before although he is highly critical of Wiki. As we can see, for the right reasons. Just look at the text and its content that is online now. It would be better to delete this entry right now. I hope that the author sends his permission to the given Wiki address so that we see some improvements in quality here.
Otaku00 (
talk)
14:16, 9 August 2016 (UTC)reply
I have just modified one external link on
Buddhist view of marriage. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.