From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair use rationale for Image:NS logo.jpg

Image:NS logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot ( talk) 23:52, 2 January 2008 (UTC) reply

Fair use rationale for Image:RGS Save the White Elephants.jpg

Image:RGS Save the White Elephants.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot ( talk) 04:00, 24 January 2008 (UTC) reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Buangkok MRT Station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:39, 14 October 2017 (UTC) –   Paine Ellsworth   put'r there   21:53, 27 April 2018 (UTC) reply

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Aljunied MRT Station which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 09:31, 7 January 2018 (UTC) reply

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Buangkok MRT station/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: ZKang123 ( talk · contribs) 04:08, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Reviewer: Arconning ( talk · contribs) 17:06, 25 June 2024 (UTC) reply

I will be reviewing this, comments will probably be finished in the next 72 hours! Arconning ( talk) 17:06, 25 June 2024 (UTC) reply

@ ZKang123 Here are my comments! Hope they can be addressed. Arconning ( talk) 16:02, 27 June 2024 (UTC) reply
@ Arconning: Responded.-- ZKang123 ( talk) 00:47, 28 June 2024 (UTC) reply
@ ZKang123 Just one more issue, the title of the artwork is "Water, Nature & Contemporary". The lead says "Water, Nature and the Contemporary" Arconning ( talk) 06:34, 30 June 2024 (UTC) reply
Fixed.-- ZKang123 ( talk) 06:37, 30 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Prose and MoS

Lead and infobox

  • The station will also serve an upcoming integrated development Sengkang Grand Residencies and a future bus interchange., add commas after development and Residencies.
  • Civil Defence shelter, add comma at the end.
  • An Art-in-Transit artwork Water, Nature and the Contemporary by Vincent Leow is displayed at this station., An Art-in-Transit artwork by Vincent Leow, Water, Nature & Contemporary, is displayed at this station.

Constructions

  • re-developed, remove hyphen.

Delay in opening

White elephant incidents and station opening

Details

Artwork

Images

  • Images have proper licenses and are relevant to the article.

Refs

  • I would suggest linking the references without links, though a source is a source. Pass.
  • Random source check: References 2, 15, and 30, are okay.
  • Reference 44 has moved to a new location. Information is not on the current website provided.
  • Earwig's fine, manual check same. Pass.

Misc

  • No ongoing edit war, focused and broad information about the topic, neutral.
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination

  • ... that in a rare form of public protest in Singapore, eight white cardboard elephants were put up to lobby for Buangkok MRT station's opening?
Improved to Good Article status by ZKang123 ( talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 15 past nominations.

ZKang123 ( talk) 01:58, 5 July 2024 (UTC). reply

Policy compliance:

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: Yes
  • Interesting: Yes
  • Other problems: Yes
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Got GA status 5 days ago, so the article and its hook is okay. I omitted the word "rare" because the sources don't exactly state that this type of protest is rare in Singapore. If the nominator can provide source for the claim then I will reverse it. Mehedi Abedin 13:45, 5 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Well, according to Public demonstrations in Singapore, yes they are rare.-- ZKang123 ( talk) 14:03, 5 July 2024 (UTC) reply

@ ZKang123: Need an inline citation, because that would be WP:OR if we accept the hook without inline citation that states it is rare or any kind of indication in the source. Mehedi Abedin 14:14, 5 July 2024 (UTC) reply
Other sources [1], [2]-- ZKang123 ( talk) 03:06, 6 July 2024 (UTC) reply
I think you don't understand. You need a source that clearly states or indicates that "the act of putting eight white cardboard elephants for Buangkok MRT station's opening is a 'rare' form of public protest in Singapore". The two sources you provided talks about rare protest in Singapore but nothing about eight white cardboard elephants for Buangkok MRT station's opening. Mehedi Abedin 05:36, 6 July 2024 (UTC) reply