This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
User Tewapack wants to use numbers in section headings, violating MOS:HEADINGS. Proposed examples are "Professional wins (6)" or "LPGA Tour wins (1)". It is not only unconventional to use numbers in subheadings (other examples within Wikipedia?) but potentially will be confusing to casual users of the article. The numbers do not agree with content contained within subsections. If important, text could be added.
Per WP:BRD, I'm reverting and placing the examples here for other editors to review/comment. Because there is no consensus per WP:CONSENSUS, the content/subheadings in question should not be reinstated to the article. Also, please be aware of WP:3RR. -- Zefr ( talk) 21:16, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
It's logical that a previous year ranking of the OWGR is dated to the last day of that year, but there is no reason to reject the current year ranking for information having broad interest. The source is secondary, independent and official, it is dynamic according to current performance, and is a statistic of interest to the public and other parties, such as the LPGA, competitors, and marketers. Tewapack opines it will not be updated in the current year, and perhaps this applies to other golfer articles. The encyclopedia faces this potential timeline issue across thousands of articles, but does not discourage maintenance of dynamic information per WP:POINT. As long as the source is secondary and remains the official ranking system, there is no objective reason it cannot have the within-year ranking displayed. Changing back the edit and asking that this objective issue is not used for POV-based warring. -- Zefr ( talk) 13:48, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
User:Zefr added birdies to the article's "LPGA Tour career summary" table, arguing that it is "an official LPGA stat associated with scoring performance". There are many official LPGA stats that could be added to this or any LPGA players table (see [1]). The question is - what is the value of adding any stat to a table that already takes up lots of column width. The stats already listed are commonly used in these types of tables and are a better measure of performance than cherry-picking a stat that she's ranked high in for a couple of years. If her performance is really noteworthy than it is better highlighted in the text of the article. Per WP:BRD, I'm reverting until discussion is finished. Tewapack ( talk) 19:06, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Under the Professional wins category, 17 wins are detailed: 12 on the LPGA Tour, one on the Symetra (formerly Epson) Tour, and 4 under "Other" for which we had no sources and only three were listed until this edit today.
The LPGA bio here under both Professional and Amateur Highlights confirms the 2015 professional win and the 4 other pro wins while she was an amateur from 2012-14. Posting here for confirmation by Tewapack and/or others. Zefr ( talk) 18:39, 12 January 2023 (UTC)