![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | → | Archive 15 |
i'm sure that there have been far more references to britney spears in pop culture than that and i don't think you should act like you've listed all of them. it's impossible to actually complete that so maybe it should be removed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.127.193.43 ( talk) 00:35, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
The picture is very dated and not very flattering. I believe a more recent picture such as britney's public appearence to Jim Carrey's charity event would be better suited. She has been highly praised for her look at this event, and is said to be "glowing" and "back to her old self." ( 86.158.15.95 ( talk) 00:22, 11 August 2008 (UTC))
I see the problem at hand but could you not ask wire image or something, as the people at wikipedia are the only people who can do something about it. I have found the page with the images on incase anyone doesnt know what i mean. http://www.wireimage.com/SearchResults.aspx?igi=326381&s=britney%20spears&sfld=C&vwmd=e
I feel more should be mentioned about blackout and how well "piece of me" did world wide, and her recent nominations at the 08 vma's for best music video "piece of me" and best female video also."piece of me". besides from this, there is also the fact that nothing is mentioned about her recent "recovery" and how she has kept out of the limelight and has got her looks back. sorry for being a pain but i feel more should be mentioned on the present front. ( 86.158.15.95 ( talk) 01:46, 11 August 2008 (UTC))
I think the article should be amended to include her new album that is coming out in just a few months (source: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,387021,00.html) under Discography instead of "personal life and struggles" 68.4.85.79 ( talk) 07:27, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
Should we put in the fact that Britney was accused of backmasking hit me baby one more time? Vitual aelita ( talk) 13:31, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
Is Britney really mezzo-soprano? I don't have musical education but IMHO she sounds higher thaN Christina Aguilera who is soprano —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.131.137.50 ( talk) 09:02, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
Mezzo-soprano is lower than soprano... she's in a range between mezzo-soprano and contralto. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cyanide7 ( talk • contribs) 18:08, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
I think maybe "Toxic" should be put in with the audio samples. Its the centre point of her current albums and demonstrates a new sound which she explored. I know it had too many audio samples before but I do think "Toxic" should be included.
I believe I have found a better free picture to use to replace the current main image it can be found here [2]. The source is from the Romanian Wikipedia site, Can this image be used?-- Theoneintraining ( talk) 11:29, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
Well now the main image has changed again, well she looks hot so lets hope it stays lol. — Realist 2 11:11, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
Isn't this section a tad "fan made"? It sounds really subjective. Maddyfan ( talk) 11:59, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
Check the licence for the picture its perfectly acceptable, reliable, allowed and ther is no reason it should be taken off Ogioh ( talk) 17:49, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
Well Someone Needs to get one of her there because that picture on there now is so outdated. There are more current free ones, the picture does not suit the article because it is outdated. Get a current one. -- Moairguard ( talk) 23:48, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
ok...for starters slamming me and telling everyone to watch out for my posts is a bit rude and overeacting sane as i've made a lot of useful contribution to wikipedia and spent a lot of time researching information to make up pages. I found a picture of the 2008 vma's its off the la times site so i don't know if newspaper picture are copyright infringement or not, http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/music/la-et-env-vma-britney-performance,0,3710712.photo there are no copyright markings or warnings about the picture so i'm going to upload it on that basis but will have no problems with anyone taking it down solong as there is a valid reason or they found a copyright warning. Ogioh ( talk) 17:32, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
I'm lost now if the image thats on the page now is free why's it all over the web? Ogioh ( talk) 17:18, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
If the main picture on the britney spears article is free, then why is it on many sites on the web? Ogioh ( talk) 17:48, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
What i meant is it could be copyrighted to a certain site but someone put it up saying they owned it...but it probably isn't Ogioh ( talk) 18:37, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
I got this new picture of a bebo fanpage, i asked the owner did they have any free images that they were the copyright owner of and they only said one (out of hundreds on the page) so i think its genuine and plus its not photographer like quality so i think its good to say its o.k. to be put up... Ogioh ( talk) 19:19, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
Is it just me, or is the entire middle section of the article comprised almost exclusively by quotes and has very little original writing? There are barely any sentences that don't contain some sort of quote.. "XXX said ___".. "XXX commented ___"... I mean.. a moderate amount of quoting is fine, but it's kind of gotten out of hand by whoever wrote the newer sections (Musical style and performance, Choreography, Live performances, Public image, etc.).
This is Wikipedia, not Wikiquote. 156.34.152.108 ( talk) 21:25, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
I deleted the old picture because it's not really that good of a picture. I think we should wait to find one of Britney at least in 2007 or 2008. The 2003 picture was unflatting,it Needed to be removed —Preceding unsigned comment added by Npurplegirl ( talk • contribs) 23:39, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
Image:Britney Spears 2008.jpg has been permited for use by the copyright owner and and an email has been forwarded to the OTRS i think it is..
Finlly, a new picture thats alowd —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ogioh ( talk • contribs) 22:50, 13 September 2008 (UTC) Ogioh ( talk) 00:02, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
We also need more info on the sales of blackout and details on some of the other singles released. — Realist 2 14:49, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
Its on her awards page that she's been the internets most saerched celebrity for the last 6 or so years runing...and today sky news reported that she's been added to the latest guinnes book of world records for being the most searched celebrity. I think this should be on the main article somewhere, a short sentence in the opening paragrph would probably be best.
By the way, just out of curiousity. Who changed the whole format of this article? Now its all chunky and hard to understand, it was much better when the page was split into career and personal life Ogioh ( talk) 21:31, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
I agree bookkeeper it is time this article has a major clean-up. I am going to start by getting it reviewed. Then we can create a list of things to improve.-- Theoneintraining ( talk) 16:18, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
== New Picture!! ==-- 71.125.102.156 ( talk) 22:08, 21 September 2008 (UTC) Found One!!:). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Npurplegirl ( talk • contribs) 20:38, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
I have uploaded and added a new image that is freely licensed.
TheLeft
orium
16:36, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia Deleted It :(..-- 71.125.102.156 ( talk) 21:19, 21 September 2008 (UTC) It's Free.-- LilMissNicole+++.;+= ( talk) 21:25, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
I'll Keep Looking -- LilMissNicole+++.;+= ( talk) 21:29, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
If it's not free,then why is it still there?And I Did find another.-- 71.125.102.156 ( talk) 22:08, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
I thought we'd all agreed a major tidy up was needed but when i cut out half of the introduction (still leaving in a lot of what doesn't need to be there just to not overly annoy the person that put it in) but it was reverted back. The introduction really doesn't need to be that long it just needs to say her occupation birth, birthplace and major awards and/or significances like being the world's most powerful celebrity a couple of years ago and her grammy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ogioh ( talk • contribs) 12:00, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
The appropriate length of the lead section depends on the total length of the article. As a general guideline, the lead should be no longer than four paragraphs. The following suggestion may be useful:
< 15,000 characters | around 32 kilobytes | > 30,000 characters |
---|---|---|
one or two paragraphs | two or three paragraphs | three or four paragraphs |
Considering the size of the total article (over 80 kilos), this article actually should be a full four paragraphs. We can always rewrite/reword it to make the text flow better, but you can't cut critical aspects of her biography out of the lead. The Bookkeeper (of the Occult) 12:31, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | → | Archive 15 |
The article says: "In June 2009, it was confirmed that Spears is dating her agent Jason Trawick". But that relationship hasn't been confirmed. In some magazines, Britney said that those rumors are funny for her. It's just a rumor, and curiously, the first magazine that began with those rumors was "Star", a sensationalist tabloid.-- Charles.mx ( talk) 23:14, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
I removed the "Lead too short" template from this article, as there is no discussion here about it. Although not perfect, the coverage in the lead is not so egregiously little as to need templating. If anyone has concerns about the lead being too short, or even better, suggestions as to which parts of the article should be included in the lead summary, please post them here. Yob Mod 18:29, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
I found a very interesting article about Britney and her music that might fit into the wikipage. I think we could add this to the page to show that there are some reviewers who don't just think of her as a manufactured pop star. This critic acknowledges that it is Britney who is the defining factor of the Britney empire not just an add along to the machine. Here are some choice excepts I think could be added.
During her world-conquering peak, she was just about as cutting edge as you could get in the world of global pop superstardom. Spears didn’t just work with big names, she gave big names their names, and maintained her high currency in the world’s most fickle industry for years, when most aspiring starlets are lucky to manage months.
She may not have had the moves of Beyonce or the vocal chops of Christina Aguilera, but she made up for it with a flair for theatrics and a willingness to go places most teenage pop stars wouldn’t dare. Her shock flesh-toned body suit at the MTV Awards in 2000 predates Lady Gaga by almost a decade, while Spears was tumbling through the air on bungee ropes years before Pink even staged her first concert tour.
There is also an excerpt that I think could be added into her vocal style in the page:
The thing about Spears, though, is that her biggest songs, no matter how committee-created or impossibly polished, have always been convincing because of her delivery, her commitment and her presence...Spears expresses perfectly the conflicting urges of adolescence, the tension between chastity and sexual experience, between hedonism and responsibility, between confidence and vulnerability. And unlike the somewhat aloof Beyonce, Spears’ trials and tribulations just make her seem all the more human and believable.
Net-worth:
In addition to her music sales, Spears has earned a reported $370 million from ads and endorsement deals. Some of the products to carry her name include a series of perfumes from Elizabeth Arden, a video game called Britney’s Dance Beat and a singing Britney Spears doll.
Source: http://www.theage.com.au/news/entertainment/music/2009/10/24/1256147928875.html
Skinwalker03 ( talk) 00:03, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
Hey can somebody change the album sales back to 85 million cause it said on her " Britney Spears discography " that she sold over 85 million! -- TotalBlackout —Preceding undated comment added 04:34, 18 March 2010 (UTC).
I know that this has been disputed a lot, but I am not complaining about the number. I just think you should change the wording from records (which means singles and albums combined), to just 83 million albums sold; because her total albums sales are estimated at more than 83 million, so that is the way it should be stated. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.91.218.24 ( talk) 20:38, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
she sold 92 mill albums . in 2007 before blackout she sold 85 mill blackout sold 3 mill and circus sold 4 mill togther its 92 mill . you need you need to check your source and to update the details
Don't know if this helps but in 2004 the My Prerogative album booklet states she had sold 44 million albums worldwide then from memory in 2004 just so disagree with the comment above saying she had sold 84 million then.
The article has recently been updated mentioning Britney's record sales, that is said to be in the excess of 100 million worldwide. I counted the total ALBUM sales mentioned here on Wikipedia and got about 85-88 million ALBUMS sold worldwide. When talking about RECORDS you usually mean both ALBUM and SINGLES sales. Therefore I think that considering Britney's singles sales, which are estimated at between 30-70 million worldwide (probably not less than 40 million, cosidering that she has released about 30 singles, including big sellers such as "...Baby One More Time"(9 million worldwide according to Wikipedia), "Piece of Me" (at least 1 million in US according to Wikipedia), "Womanizer" (3 million (US only!) according to Wikipedia), "Circus" (5.5 million worldwide according to Wikipedia), "3" (1.6 million (US only!) according to Wikipedia) ); the total worldwide record sales for Britney Spears should be adjusted from "more than 100 million" to "more than 120 million", taking in account the singles sales. It is hard to find any exact figures for each and every one of the singles. Though it is not unrealistic to assume, after doing some research on the Internet and on Wikipedia that each single on average has sold about a million copies worldwide (some more, some less), giving Britney at least 30 million in singles sales. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
151.156.178.129 (
talk)
10:24, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
I think the article became highly negative since Bookkeeper began writing about it. Also, there's fake information about the Australian shows. It says that her fans were disappointed. They weren't her fans! Her fans knew that she was going to be lip-syncing. And, I guess no one left the show.
Britney can sing, but almost all the reviews about her in the article are negative. That's so bad. -- Charles.mx ( talk) 06:33, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
Who the hell started with those stupid comparisons with Madonna and Janet Jackson? We're not comparing Britney, everything's just about her. It was too way better before, but someone, who seems to be a hater, began citing comparisons. And, of course, it's not neutral. why? Because, all comparisons are nergative! I hate this article since then. -- Charles.mx ( talk) 20:27, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
Just a quick note to say it was widely covered in the Australian media that many of the Brittany Spears fans did walk out of her first few concerts when it was first discovered that she was lip syncing. It's a practice that isn't accepted by Australians, especially in the live music states such as Victoria. Please see the following News.com.au article - http://www.couriermail.com.au/entertainment/confidential/fuming-fans-ditch-britney-tickets/story-e6freq7o-1225797239986 -- 58.168.233.134 ( talk) 13:52, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
What happened to the "Products & Endorsements"-section??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.100.49.241 ( talk) 21:12, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
It says she born in Mississippi, but the citation site says born in Kentwood, LA. This doesn't make sense. Can someone clear this up and/or edit it? Also numerous other site's say she was born in Kentwood, LA. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kinojroy ( talk • contribs) 00:51, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
No, the citation points here http://www.billboard.com/artist/britney-spears/bio/290150#/artist/britney-spears/bio/290150 it's the first citation. -- Kino ( talk) 04:38, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
And by the way, that's a marriage certificate, not a birth certificate. -- Kino ( talk) 04:41, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
Under the "Products and Endorsements" the article says: Her latest Elizabeth Arden fragrance "Believe", was released in September 2007.[231] In January, 2008, Spears released "Curious Heart".[232][233] Spears released a new fragrance entitled "Hidden Fantasy" in January 2009.[228] The "Her latest Elizabeth Arden fragrance" part should be updated to reflect that it is no longer her latest (as Curious Heart is a new variation of previous Arden/Britney Heart, and likewise Hidden Fantasy of Fantasy; you can check the wiki pages on Heart and Fantasy for proof). If you wish to count Curious Heart and Hidden Fantasy as the same thing as the earlier Heart and Fantasy fragrances, I'd recommend changing the word "latest" to "next" to circumvent the confusion and seemingly sloppy wording while retaining accuracy. 24.181.233.0 ( talk) 03:05, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
New perfume "Radiance" to be released 2010. This has been officially confirmed and there is already an article on Wikipedia about it. Is it worth mentioning in the main article? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiance_(fragrance) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.156.178.129 ( talk) 06:53, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
I was wondering is there enough information to produce a page on her next studio album? We know sum of the songs, the writers, the approximate date. It would just seem logical even if it was just a small page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.7.242.82 ( talk) 10:31, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
I think you should take of May 2010 for the predicted release date. Here's a new article which says a summer release instead of a spring one. http://www.nypost.com/p/blogs/popwrap/new_britney_spears_album_is_epic_SAOzmGyFUNIVRm77GWG1vN
Britney.com confirms a album is being recorded.
[1] —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
24.14.131.176 (
talk)
05:57, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
New INFO!!! http://www.britney.com/us/blog/new-music-questions-answered —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.7.242.82 ( talk) 17:38, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
NEW INFO!!
Hi, Britney Spears stated on her official website that the rumours about a seventh studio album wwere bullsh*t http://www.britneyspears.com added by Jordan Voase —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.190.15.199 ( talk) 17:35, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
I added that Perez Hilton gave information about supposedly listening to new Britney tracks and giving a positive response to them, I in no way said he was telling the truth, but referenced him as reliable, and I even gave a source link of a video of him physically telling us what he claims to have heard as well, so why was it deleted?
JULY 13, 2010
I'm adding a paragraph to the "2008-present" about the new album since we have confirmation from her label and People.com.
[2]
[3] Producers Max Martin, Danja, Darkchild, Tiësto, and Rusko are all being added with the paragraph since all have either rumored or confirmed work with Britney.
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
There was only a brief period when I was aware of Britney Spears. It was just after "baby one more time" was released. For months, every mention of her included a comment about her having gotten breast implants. When sources said she spent some time in hospital, her spokesperson said this was for a knee operation.
I remember Marilyn Manson commenting on how she accepted a video award: a teenager with breast implants thanked god for her video's success. How come this article has no mention? A quick web search turned up ample sources:
Is it because these comments were never proven? Does that make this topic contrary to the BLP policy? I'd have to think about whether or not that would make sense... Gronky ( talk) 04:39, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
Proven or not? Have you heard Britney Spears herself actually say the album is to be released in May of 2010? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.238.96.28 ( talk) 01:07, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
Source : [3] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Smolu ( talk • contribs) 14:10, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
I am so confused i mean go to 8notes.com then click on artist and find Britney Spears. Go to biograpy and scroll down to where it shows album sales and it said Baby One More Time sold over 25 million copies Oops.. I Did It Again sold over 20 million copies Britney sold over 16 million copies In the Zone sold over 10 million copies
It said that the article was taken from Wikipedia back in 2005 and how could Britney Spears' album sales decrease
if it was taken back nearly 5 years ago from wikipedia??????? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Notagirlnotyetawoman ( talk • contribs) 02:18, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
Recently at the grammys the sun and many other papers and web sites have said Lady Gaga and Britney talked and have said they will soon collaborate. I believe this should be mentioned. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.7.242.82 ( talk) 18:22, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
it was mentioned but, someone took the info out. can someone restore it?~~ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.81.117.155 ( talk) 03:20, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
This isn't in writing anywhere so it shouldn't be added just because it "sounds cool" to have them collaborating. 125.238.96.198 ( talk) 14:31, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
Actually it was mentioed in many news papers including the sun etc. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.7.242.82 ( talk) 16:27, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
Does anyone think Britney Spears' religious beliefs/worldviews should be mentioned? Is he religious? Wandering Courier ( talk) 23:55, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
She has said in 2009 interviews that she still believes in God when she looks at her kids so... -- 212.187.45.107 ( talk) 23:38, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
It's awesome that Wikipedia doesn't need anonymous contributions anymore, but someone should either change the spelling of perfromed [sic] or update the corresponding entry in Wiktionary. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.22.241.88 ( talk) 04:54, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
Hi, At the time, i thought the re-direct was a good idea as discogs was the only source we could find. I always knew it was real as i own a copy of the CD Single. But now, there are reliable sources confirming the singles release. The Music Charting Industry confirms that the CD Single was released worldwide on 15 September 2009. [4] Also, it states that it was released worldwide, not just in Australia. If you look at "3" on that site, it states the pacific countries where it was released. It tells you where the CD Single was released and the EP was released. However, on the Unusual You CD single, it doesn't give a pacific area, which means it was released worldwide. I think that giving one for the most reliable sources on the net, that Unusual You can be a single on Wikipedia. Is it possible to put it back up? Thank - You-- Apeaboutsims ( talk) 02:25, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
I would like to suggest that Britney's two husbands get added to the infobox. I tried, but it would not stick. Due to the protections?
Jason Alexander (June 2004: annulled)
Kevin Federline (Sept 2004 - July 2007: divorced)
Nutster ( talk) 22:42, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
That should be added. As for a " decent reliable source", that would only take about 30 seconds using the Internet, since it is common knowledge that she was married to these 2 men.-- BeckiGreen ( talk) 02:17, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
That one has been up for a while, I think you should change it to;
http://cdn.buzznet.com/media/jj1//2009/08/britney-tcas/britney-spears-teen-choice-awards-2009-02.jpg
or
http://cdn.buzznet.com/media/jj1//2009/08/britney-tcas/britney-spears-teen-choice-awards-2009-04.jpg
or
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_U2o-3lgs4t0/SmYTEInnvgI/AAAAAAAABOk/c2FmyWrb508/s400/britney-spears-candies-ad-campaign-fall-winter-2009-2010-photo.jpg (This one is more recent!)
Britney's rep released a statement to People Magazine that Jason and Britney are an item and that therefor he quit working with her professionally.
I wanted to put this in the article but I don't know where since they don't say how long they've been dating. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ikkomuitnederland ( talk • contribs) 08:59, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
basically every criticism is knocked back with the help of about 5 different quotes in her favour. it seems way too overly positive for someone who is so frequently criticised - Drthatguy ( talk) 10:40, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
{{ editsemiprotected}} to change britney spears sales. there's a mistake in her albums sales. she didnt sold 85 millions , she sold 92 millions albums. according to Nielsen she sold 85 mill in 2007 before blackout.
85 mill[2007] + blackout - 3 mil + circus - 4 mil = 92 mill
you need you need to check your source and to update the details
Bar17 (
talk)
10:13, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
I don't have an account at the moment, so I have to make these suggestions this way. Sorry.
Second paragraph of intro says "...her first four albums debut at number one." Up 'til then, only one album's sales has been mentioned. It may be accurate, but in context it seems painfully awkward. Next sentence should read "on hiatus" and not "under." Next sentence "to peak" and not "to peaked" and the sentence seems run-on.
Next paragraph, "as the eighth best selling" and "of her albums as certified."
In the bio the "Spears is of English heritage" sentence is a twisted mess. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.98.193.99 ( talk) 19:52, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
Her seventh studio album is expected for release around October 26th, 2010 and is either titled "Halloween" or has some kind of halloween theme to it. My friend found this and has a source so I will have to check with him again. 125.238.96.198 ( talk) 10:36, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
She's is not dead http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/1388131.stm —Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnny pt ( talk • contribs) 19:05, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
This hoax probably merits inclusion in the article, as http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/1388131.stm is a verifiable reference from reliable source. — Jeff G. ツ 19:42, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
Britney bumped her rank from #13 to #6, I think it should be mentioned. Celeb 100 FAQ: Yes, Britney Spears Really Made $64 Million Last Year. Here's How. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.130.139.70 ( talk) 13:49, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
We may not have a release date or even an album title, but we do have TONS of confirmed demos posted on her website, her record's site, and YouTube, even though the latter is absolutely NOT a reliable source. (Cprice1000 17:55, 14 July 2010 (UTC)) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cprice1000 ( talk • contribs)
Do you think maybe we should include a section on it? There has been substantial information of a unreleased album recorded in the past. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cprice1000 ( talk • contribs) 14:51, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
I think something should be added under Musical style and performance about Britney's Cheek microphone which she almost never preforms without. It's something that has been seen on Britney whilst performing since she first burst onto the seen. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.7.242.82 ( talk) 16:30, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
Agreed.Cprice1000 16:31, 29 July 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cprice1000 ( talk • contribs)
An episode has been confirmed, it'll be the second episode of the second season, I think it should be mentioned. [10]
UPDATE She's going to appear, according to "Glee" creator, Ryan Murphy [11] —Preceding unsigned comment added by ColdAsFire Baby ( talk • contribs) 15:52, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
Hey guys great work on the page and all BUT I was wondering where's the evidence to back up the fact that Blackout has sold 3+ million? The only link used to substantiate it is an article from the guardian where Alexis is reviewing Circus. See it here http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2008/nov/28/britney-spears-circus is this enough "evidence" to warrant it being added to the page?
Thanks Ryonslaught ( talk) 19:05, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
Britney Spears pop music has a very questionable artistic value, but what's more important, how she can be clamed an musical artist, musician (someone who inspires, creates peace), since doesn't write own songs, but American producers do all her music, lyrics, and using her as an instrument of entertainment and nothing more. Do not confuse musicians with some quasi-singers.
Therefore, its first must sentence change from "recording artist and entertainer" to "singer and entertainer" and wherever similar.-- 89.164.15.123 ( talk) 17:42, 21 August 2010 (UTC)