Talk:british Support For Israel In The Israel �hamas War

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the British support for Israel in the Israel–Hamas war article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Warning: active arbitration remedies

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:

You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Further information

The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:

Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.

With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:

Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.

After being warned, contentious topics procedure can be used against any editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process. Contentious topic sanctions can include blocks, topic-bans, or other restrictions.
Editors may report violations of these restrictions to the Arbitration enforcement noticeboard.

If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. When in doubt, don't revert!

Military history: British / European / Middle East / Post-Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	Middle Eastern military history task force
	Post-Cold War task force

Israel

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Project Israel To Do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Assess : Rate the Unassessed Israel-related articles and Unknown-importance Israel-related articles.
Categorization : Diffuse articles from Category:Companies of Israel.
Cleanup : Cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category and the tool's wiki page.
Collaborate : Participate in WikiProject Israel Palestine Collaboration.
Copyedit : Timeline of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict in 2005
Deletion sorting : Participate in discussions at WikiProject Deletion sorting/Israel.
Expand : Ayala Procaccia, Diamond industry in Israel, Edna Arbel, Levin Kipnis, Rami Kleinstein, Sephardic Haredim, Zman Tel Aviv, Nachum Heiman, Public Defence (Israel), Prisoner of Zion, Trial of Benjamin Netanyahu, Day to Mark the Departure and Expulsion of Jews from the Arab Countries and Iran, Pre-Modern Aliyah
See also Articles needing translation from Hebrew Wikipedia.
Geographical coordinates : Add geographic coordinates to Israel articles missing geocoordinate data.
Infobox : Add infoboxes to Israel articles needing infoboxes.
Maintain : See Israel articles needing attention.
Map : See discussion at Module:Location map/data/Israel. Add maps to articles in Wikipedia requested maps in Israel.
NPOV : Jewish exodus from Arab and Muslim countries
Photo : Add pictures to articles in Wikipedia requested photographs in Israel.
Stubs : See Israel stubs.
Update : Basic Law proposal: Israel as the Nation-State of the Jewish People
Other :
- Translate to Hebrew : David Bar-Hayim, Guy Bavli, and Guy Oseary.
- Merge Nahal Rafiah ( draft, heb) into Nahal as requested by Wikipedia authority

United Kingdom

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Page bias

Can't edit this page however the current tone seems very biased - it does not reflect the extremely small scale of UK arms exports to Israel, and seems to imply that they are huge. British Ministers have stated that UK arms exports amount to only 0.02% of Israel's military imports ( https://hansard.parliament.uk/pdf/commons/2024-03-26), and this is mostly limited to parts for the American-supplied F-35 which they are contractually obligated to provide.

Additionally, I don't believe this article currently accurately reflects the UK's political position on the conflict. They have been calling for a ceasefire for some time ( https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/the-uk-has-long-called-for-an-immediate-humanitarian-pause-leading-to-a-sustainable-ceasefire-as-the-fastest-way-to-get-hostages-out-and-aid-in-uk-s) and while they do "support the Israeli right to self-defence" they have stated that this is "not unconditional" and that they "expect [them] to abide by international humanitarian law, even when challenged in this way" ( https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-68751550). The article seems to suggest UK support for Israel is akin to that of the US, when the UK has, for example, been abstaining from UN votes rather than voting against like the US ( https://news.un.org/en/story/2023/12/1144717) Flobberz ( talk) 12:36, 6 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Absolutely! The UK’s arms support to Israel is dwarfed by American arms exports to Israel and also Israel’s very large domestic arms industry, which is currently the world’s 9th largest. Bean guy2 ( talk) 21:37, 24 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Not surprising. I also find the section heading titled "Pro-Israel lobby" somewhat contentious. TrottieTrue ( talk) 21:28, 22 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Requested move 8 July 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: No Consensus - neither numerically, nor in terms of argumentation, is there a consensus on moving this topic. As there was only 1 !vote after the last re-list I see no reason to re-list this again. This close is without prejudice to further proposals, particularly given the fast-chaning nature of the subject covered here. ( non-admin closure) FOARP ( talk) 10:24, 26 July 2024 (UTC) reply

British support for Israel in the Israel–Hamas war → United Kingdom and the Israel–Hamas war – Not only match two other articles, Qatar and the United States about their role in this war, but a word like "support" isn't neutral even if the UK policy is to support Israel in this conflict. The article does make mention of opposition to the government support for Israel, therefore this isn't solely about support for Israel. The title should be reflected in a more precise manner than an outright position of support or opposition in the title. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 22:58, 8 July 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. Adumbrativus ( talk) 08:02, 17 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Support per nom Kowal2701 ( talk) 18:55, 9 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Support per nom Jebiguess ( talk) 22:05, 9 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Oppose for now. We do have United States support for Israel in the Israel–Hamas war, Qatari support for Hamas, British support for Iraq during the Iran–Iraq War, United States support for Ukraine in the Russian invasion of Ukraine, United States support for Iraq during the Iran–Iraq War, Israeli support for Iran during the Iran–Iraq war, French support for Iraq during the Iran–Iraq War, North Korean support for Iran during the Iran–Iraq War, Alleged Pakistani support for Osama bin Laden etc. The title you are proposing is quite contrary to WP:CONSISTENT. VR _{(Please
ping on reply)} 00:07, 12 July 2024 (UTC) reply

The U.S. Ukraine article was moved by a new user whom I've reverted. However, both the U.S. article and U.K. article about this war include government policy to support Israel but are not just about that support. This does include opposition to the policy. Articles for the Iran-Iraq War only mention government policy throughout and nothing about opposition to said policy. Therefore, a title like that for those articles is fine. The Bin Laden one is more of a notable accusation that Pakistan's government has faced for years and is not really an article about a war, but a related topic in regard to the War on Terror. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 13:01, 12 July 2024 (UTC) reply

The British government position has been overwhelmingly in support of Israel and against Palestinians. Unlike the US supplying weapons to both Iran and Iraq during the Iran-Iraq war, the British government has exclusively supplied weapons to Israel. We need to call a WP:SPADE a spade. VR _{(Please
ping on reply)} 15:07, 12 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Oppose per Vice regent. Skitash ( talk) 21:20, 13 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Support per nom . Hogo-2020 ( talk) 08:02, 15 July 2024 (UTC) reply

Oppose per Vice regent as the proposed title is contrary to WP:CONSISTENT. Ainty Painty ( talk) 07:22, 21 July 2024 (UTC) reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 9 July 2024

It is requested that an edit be made to the extended-confirmed-protected article at British support for Israel in the Israel–Hamas war. ( · history · last · links · protection log)

This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y".

The edit may be made by any extended confirmed user. Remember to change the |answered=no parameter to "yes" when the request has been accepted, rejected or on hold awaiting user input. This is so that inactive or completed requests don't needlessly fill up the edit requests category. You may also wish to use the {{ EEp}} template in the response. To request that a page be protected or unprotected, make a protection request.

This article needs serious updating now that the UK government has changed. (like changing PM to then-PM, foreign secretary to then-FM, etc.) Yeshivish613 ( talk) 16:34, 9 July 2024 (UTC) reply

"British ministers have openly endorsed Israel's forced evacuation orders and unlawful collective punishment of the Gaza Strip, without condemning any of Israel's policies despite the mounting death toll."

David Cameron said while Foreign Secretary that the UK's support for Israel is not unconditional in light of the increasing humanitarian cost, and this sentence doesn't seem as neutral as it could be. Should it be changed? SirShaunIV ( talk) 20:53, 22 July 2024 (UTC) reply

On 19 October, British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak arrived in Tel Aviv in a two-day visit to "express solidarity with the Israeli people", as the relentless Israeli bombardment of the Gaza Strip has killed over 3,400 Palestinians.

The use of the word "relentless" definitely questions the neutrality. SirShaunIV ( talk) 21:06, 22 July 2024 (UTC) reply