![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
![]() | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. The request was not specific enough. You may consider leaving your comments on the Talk page or escalating significant issues to the conflict of interest noticeboard. |
On Oct. 10, 2014, the Supreme Court of British Columbia ruled: "I conclude that the interpretation that successive or recurrent approvals may be granted is reasonable and, in any event, correct. The petition is dismissed." [1]
Wrightwords ( talk) 23:28, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Not done Not clear what it is you want doing here. Please provide in a Change X to Y format.
Amortias (
T)(
C)
22:15, 9 March 2015 (UTC)