This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States: Iowa / Nebraska / Omaha Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Iowa (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Nebraska (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Nebraska - Omaha (assessed as Low-importance). Higher education This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles Christianity Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

There is a lot of unsourced information here, names upon names of buildings, unreferenced statements about sports and so on. This is not relevant for an encyclopedia; it could potentially be misleading because there are no references, and looks a lot like advertising. If nothing changes, I would recommend deleting some parts. -- Melchior2006 ( talk) 19:37, 19 February 2023 (UTC) reply

Since no one chimed in, I will streamline the passage a bit. Take out some of the advertising. -- Melchior2006 ( talk) 19:18, 24 February 2023 (UTC) reply