This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The infobox wasn't clear before on the fact that Bilbray had previously served in Congress from a different district. If someone with more knowledge of wiki markup could make a separate section of the infobox for Bilbray's 49th district service, that would be great too. SchutteGod ( talk) 20:03, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
There has been some vandalism changing Bilbray from Pro-Life to Pro-Choice. To document his pro-life stance, here's a quote [1]:
Does anyone understand why the California Secretary of State shows Bilbray with fewer votes than Busby, yet newspapers list a different set of numbers first (only for District 50) showing Bilbray winning, followed by separate sets of vote counts for each political party taken from (an earlier update of) the Secretary of State's site? And why is District 50 the only one with a separate set of non-partisan vote totals listed first and all the other districts only have the separate sets of counts for each party? Neow 07:02, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
No comment on veteran dissent with the way Bilbray handles veteran's questions and VA disputes? Maybe that wasn't as wide-spread as some people thought with local San Diego government. Or maybe not, that laptop thing might have caught more press. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.244.160.175 ( talk) 06:23, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
Article is juevinile Wiki POV crap by left leaning college students.
Plus you should not that Bilbray is a big surfer, very noteworthy for it. I ran into him at PB in the water a few years ago.
72.82.44.253 ( talk) 04:49, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
I know blogs aren't suitable for sources, but if someone wants to research this from an actual news source then it may be notable. http://thinkprogress.org/2010/03/25/bilbray-tricare/ 75.221.106.57 ( talk) 22:23, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
The following paragraph was removed by another editor on the grounds that it was "of little significance." I'm on the fence about that:
Thoughts? Arbor8 ( talk) 02:57, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
References
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Brian Bilbray. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 03:26, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Brian Bilbray. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2006/6/4/154922.shtml{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/politics/20060830-9999-1mi30vote.htmlWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:25, 25 July 2017 (UTC)