This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Apps, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
apps on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AppsWikipedia:WikiProject AppsTemplate:WikiProject Appsapps articles
If you have issues with me fixing the page formatting and adding "citation needed" tags, you will need more of an explanation than "there are no references for the game" (in fact, not being able to find sources for the claims made in the article is a specific reason *not* to remove those tags). In general, it's poor practice to
revert a major edit wholesale without making an attempt to discuss the issue first. Don't just revert all of my edits without even discussing it. The article makes several specific claims about the number of downloads If the article does not have references to support its statements of fact (not including the plot summary), those statements do not belong in the article (see
WP:REF). While I do think the game is notable enough to warrant its own article since a decent amount of the stuff outside the plot and gameplay sections is properly cited, several statements of fact are missing citations, and finding references for those things is important to having a high-quality article. --
V2Blast (
talk)
23:49, 25 February 2015 (UTC)reply
Except there are no decent sources to be found in the net. The game is obscure and won't care a soul on covering/reviewing it. Every smartphone games were not in Wikipedia because they were not covered by the media as much as mainstream games so just putting a bright
WP:OR is obviously unfair if there are no other sources found.--
BlackGaia02 (talkpage if you dare) (
talk)
00:13, 26 February 2015 (UTC)reply
Thanks for responding. If you don't think the original research template belongs there, remove the one template instead of reverting all of my edits on the page completely. That said, there shouldn't be paragraphs upon paragraphs of original research. The Wikipedia article is not a "how-to" guide for the game (see
WP:NOTGUIDE and the linked
WP:VGSCOPE). It might belong on a wiki devoted to the game, but not this article; the gameplay section should be a brief description of the primary gameplay elements (not an overly-detailed explanation of every mechanic in the game). --
V2Blast (
talk)
00:30, 26 February 2015 (UTC)reply
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on
Brave Frontier. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.