From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Article (
|
visual edit |
history ) ·
Article talk (
|
history ) ·
Watch
Reviewer:
No Great Shaker (
talk ·
contribs )
13:44, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
reply
Basic GA criteria
Well written: the prose is clear and concise .
Well written: the spelling and grammar are correct .
Complies with the MOS guidelines for lead sections .
Complies with the MOS guidelines for article structure and layout .
Complies with the MOS guidelines for words to watch .
Complies with the MOS guidelines for writing about fiction – not applicable.
Complies with the MOS guidelines for list incorporation – not applicable.
Complies with the MOS guidelines for use of quotations – not applicable.
All statements are verifiable with inline citations provided .
All inline citations are from reliable sources, etc .
Contains a list of all references in accordance with the layout style guideline .
No original research .
No copyright violations or plagiarism .
Broad in its coverage but within scope and in summary style .
Neutral .
Stable .
Illustrated, if possible .
Images are at least fair use and do not breach copyright .
For reviews, I use the above list of criteria as a benchmark and complete the variables as I go along. Hope to provide some feedback soon.
No Great Shaker (
talk )
13:44, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
reply
Result
This is fine as far as it goes but, on balance, I have to say that it fails
GACR #3 because there simply isn't any appreciable breadth of coverage. The whole thing is an introduction only and, as such, could form an entire lead section. I think the nomination has been done too soon as significant expansion is needed.
No Great Shaker (
talk )
14:14, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
reply