This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
How does he pronounce his name??-- Sonjaaa 15:27, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
He's in the news as the dumbass who will probably ruin the Liberals chance at re-election. He clearly stated that Hezbollah is not a terrorist organization, a determination that was made by the previous Liberal administration. ( http://www.canada.com/montrealgazette/news/story.html?id=434d7281-4a35-4e4f-bad4-c4a26616fff2&k=73927&p=2)
This is an event from a pretty uneventful biography of Mr Wrzesnewskyj and as I've stated in my previous comments, a good percentage of google hits about Mr Wrzesnewskyj would actually return references to this controversy. I believe that an attempt to remove references to it is a deliberate step to hide the truth about real and well-documented event under a pretext of it being "trumped up". I suggest to leave it to wikipedia's reader to make the judgment. I would also suggest to stop politicizing the subject and stick to the facts which are what they are. I would gladly agree to discuss the phrasing, however I disagree to remove references to the event, due to its notability. FYI: any consequent attempt to completely remove all the references to this event will automatically trigger a referral to external resolution. Ilvar ( talk) 06:48, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
Just a reminder to everyone, because I see that this article has set a whole new standard in the use of YouTube links as "sources": all content on Wikipedia has to be sourced to reliable sources — meaning newspapers, magazines, other news websites, books, etc. YouTube videos are not acceptable sources — any video that actually passes our rules around primary sources is likely to fail our rules around linking to copyright-violating reposts of copyrighted material. Bearcat ( talk) 03:07, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Borys Wrzesnewskyj. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.croatianchronicle.com/ccn/life/a-strong-voice-for-croatian-canadians-the-legacy-of-borys-wrzesnewskyjWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:24, 23 July 2017 (UTC)