From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Article (
|
visual edit |
history ) ·
Article talk (
|
history ) ·
Watch
Reviewer:
Wilhelmina Will (
talk ·
contribs )
23:36, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
reply
Well-written : I made a few minor adjustments to the wording here and there, after which I believe that all prose, grammar, list-incorporation, and layout MOS policies are followed accordingly.
Like my singing? Ha-la-la-la-la-la-LA-LAAA!!! (
talk )
08:23, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
reply
(a) the prose is clear, concise, and
understandable to an appropriately broad audience ; spelling and grammar are correct
(b) it complies with the
Manual of Style guidelines for
lead sections ,
layout ,
words to watch ,
fiction , and
list incorporation
Verifiable with no original research : The article uses many reputable third-party sources, and makes frequent inline citations to them. I've detected no OR violations anywhere.
Like my singing? Ha-la-la-la-la-la-LA-LAAA!!! (
talk )
08:23, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
reply
(a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
the layout style guideline
(b)
reliable sources are
cited inline . All content that
could reasonably be challenged , except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose)
(c) it contains
no original research
Broad in its coverage : With an appropriate and non-excessive quantity of coverage on a variety of key aspects to the topic, I feel that the coverage provided by the aarticle is complete enough to satisfy this GA criterium.
Like my singing? Ha-la-la-la-la-la-LA-LAAA!!! (
talk )
08:23, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
reply
(a) it addresses the
main aspects of the topic
(b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see
summary style )
Neutral : it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. The article is neither biased towards nor against its subject, in any way.
Like my singing? Ha-la-la-la-la-la-LA-LAAA!!! (
talk )
08:23, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
reply
Stable : it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing
edit war or content dispute. No edit warring has happened on the article for at least three years.
Like my singing? Ha-la-la-la-la-la-LA-LAAA!!! (
talk )
23:58, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
reply
Illustrated , if possible, by media such as
images ,
video , or
audio : All three images used in the article are public domain, and thus cannot violate fair use policies. Each one has a valid license provided, and serves a useful purpose in illustrating the article.
Like my singing? Ha-la-la-la-la-la-LA-LAAA!!! (
talk )
07:57, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
reply
(a) media are
tagged with their
copyright statuses , and
valid non-free use rationales are provided for
non-free content
(b) media are
relevant to the topic, and have
suitable captions
Any changes/fixes/alterations that you recommended?
Binksternet (
talk )
17:21, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
reply
Nope, no need to worry about that, Binksternet. I am pleased to announce that my review of this article's GA candidacy has brought back satisfactory results. It will be my honour to add
Bomber Mafia to the list of War and military GAs. Congratulations!
Like my singing? Ha-la-la-la-la-la-LA-LAAA!!! (
talk )
08:25, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
reply
Yay! Thanks for the review!
Binksternet (
talk )
15:24, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
reply