This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Listen, uh, to whomever turned up the pro-Airbus bias in this article, can we please kill it? Comparisons on the A320 and B737 are irrelevant to the 7J7, and the 7E7 has even less to do with it. Perhaps we need a separate article on A320 vs. B737 sales?
Image:7J7.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Betacommand ( talk • contribs • Bot) 04:16, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
The Boeing corporate archives in Bellevue, Washington has a desktop-sized model of its Boeing 7J7 proposal. (There's a picture of it here: https://www.airlinereporter.com/tag/boeing-7j7/) I think the archives are available for public viewing if you make an appointment. -- User:D271l 14 May 2020