This
level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Corrected a few spelling / punctuation errors (e.g. apostrophes) 86.142.170.146 17:37, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
This page is repeatedly vandalised. Bob Paisley was never knighted and it is not within the remit of Wikipedia users to confer posthumous knighthoods as far as I am aware.
Nicander
13:15, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
I just read that newspaper article that said the FAI interviewed him for the manager's position before Jack Charlton was hired, but the paper said Wales, not Ireland at all. I don't want to change it cause it may well be true but either the statement or the link is wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.101.159.1 ( talk) 11:40, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
So I have slightly amended it to say "one of" the most succesful. Neil ( ►) 11:38, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Erm, that's a poor comparison, Paisley was manager for just nine years, and won 14 trophies (excluding the charity shield), Fergie has been manager for 24 years, so a little one sided. In Ferguson's best nine years out of 24 he won 11 trophies. You can't really compare 24 years with nine, but it is worth noting that in 24 years, Fergie has won the title 11 times, Paisley won it six times in just nine years. 86.6.56.105 ( talk) 10:28, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
It would need a source obviously, but might it be correct to say the most successful English manager of all time? Lord Cornwallis ( talk) 02:50, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
i agree that a knighthood would be justified, but posthumours knighthoods arn't awarded. http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/c/celtic/6262768.stm this article explains why jock stein wasnt awarded posthumous knighthood. sorry but its not gonna happen -- Numberwang 19:08, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
"Baked into a cake"? Is this some kind of expression or simply vandalism?- The Gnome ( talk) 23:36, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bob Paisley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:01, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
I think it would be better if the top of the article had a photo of the man himself rather than a photo of an engraving. I can understand statues and engravings for people from ancient times but for modern people I think an actual photograph of the person is better. Firestar47 ( talk) 12:38, 30 January 2024 (UTC)