This article is written in
American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other
varieties of English. According to the
relevant style guide, this should not be changed without
broad consensus.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to
animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can
the article attached to this page, help out with the
open tasks, or contribute to the
discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
This article is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing
the article, and help us
assess and improve articles to
good and
1.0 standards, or visit the
WikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about
television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can
join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the
style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
They are all on the Copyright of Catalog Entries reference. "BLESS THE HARTS "POUND PINCHERS" (2BPJ03) - SCREENPLAY." :) Yay Dad (
talk)
05:09, 18 March 2020 (UTC)reply
The production codes are stated on the reference if you click and check. I clearly see it for every single episode. If you don't see it in the list, then you will need to check by clicking the link, to which it will take you to the copyright holder information including date copyrighted and entry number. :) Yay Dad (
talk)
05:20, 18 March 2020 (UTC)reply
It clearly says the production codes for all the episodes
here. This is one example: "BLESS THE HARTS "POUND PINCHERS" (2BPJ03) - SCREENPLAY." :) Yay Dad (
talk)
05:27, 18 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Again, I am not assuming. These are facts that I have taken. I take them directly from the Catalog of Copyright Entries always for official sourcing. :) Yay Dad (
talk)
05:25, 18 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Then why on Solar Opposites is episode 7 allowed to have the code when it is directly taken from this reference? This is 20th Century Fox's method of providing production codes. If you go back to all their previous show examples. Most of them have the production codes on the copyright entry. "No, they are NOT. The only episode is episode 7. This is considered to be oringal research. You are just assuming." I do not understand. :) Yay Dad (
talk)
05:31, 18 March 2020 (UTC)reply
On
WP:OR, which states Even with well-sourced material, if you use it out of context, or to reach or imply a conclusion not directly and explicitly supported by the source, you are engaging in original research. —
YoungForever(talk)05:48, 18 March 2020 (UTC)reply
My argument is that we should use the reference as it applies to
WP:COMMONSENSE. Production codes for Bless the Harts are formatted as the references present themselves (e.g 1BPJ01). All the season 1 production codes match the codes in the Copyright of Catalog Entries. Other users online agree with the reference, and once again, using
WP:COMMONSENSE, anyone could tell you that those are the production codes.
Some Dude From North Carolina (
talk)
16:48, 29 September 2020 (UTC)reply
For one, notice how the production codes are formatted (i.e #BPJ##). Using
this example, the Copyright of Catalog Entries gives us the title of the episode (POUND PINCHERS), what series it's from (BLESS THE HARTS), the registration number (PAu004011752), when it was registered (2020-01-23), and the production code (2BPJ03). We both know that the production codes are formatted as (#BPJ##), and we also know that the references from the Copyright of Catalog Entries match the codes given for season 1. Using our "
WP:COMMONSENSE", we can assure ourselves that the production code for the episode "Pound Pinchers" is 2BPJ03, and that other references would also give the correct code.
Some Dude From North Carolina (
talk)
17:40, 29 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Again, it is considered to be
WP:SYNTH. What part of
WP:SYNTH you don't seem to understand? Did Copyright of Catalog Entries explicitly say that those are the production codes? Definitely not. You can't just assumed that they are the production codes. —
YoungForever(talk)20:05, 29 September 2020 (UTC)reply
The Copyright of Catalog Entries shares the registrations of scripts/screenplays submitted by various companies. We are specifically talking about the screenplays entered by FOX. If you notice the entries of scripts from Family Guy, The Simpsons, Duncanville, Bob's Burgers, and Bless the Harts, FOX always places similar titles. Each entry includes the series the episode is from, the episodes title, and the production code. Look
here,
here,
here, and
here for examples. We know that for previous seasons, the production codes have always matched the codes presented at the end of every episode, and that's because both the script and the episode were shared by FOX. Once again, using out "
WP:COMMONSENSE", we can assure ourselves that the production codes are accurate, as they are shared to us by FOX via the Copyright of Catalog Entries.
Some Dude From North Carolina (
talk)
13:48, 30 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Incorrect, again. I have already explicitly explained in details above why it is
WP:SYNTH. As I said before, it never explicitly say so. You are implying a conclusion not explicitly stated by the source. —
YoungForever(talk)17:28, 5 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Oppose using such codes. I would go as far as to say that production codes shouldn't be used at all, because they are often hard to find and annoying to add, so I personally think they are a waste to add to a page in the first place.
Historyday01 (
talk)
00:24, 19 December 2021 (UTC)reply
When the season finishes, there should be enough prose. We also have to take in ratings, images, and episode synoposes as well as unscheduled episodes, etc.
Orange Mo (
talk)
23:28, 4 July 2020 (UTC)reply
I still don't understand how this works. It is 5106 bytes which is how many kB? Plus each episode assuming it is 1kB + ratings, I'm not sure how much that will add up.
Orange Mo (
talk)
23:40, 4 July 2020 (UTC)reply
No, that's still not enough. What part of between 50kB and 60kB of readable prose or 50 and 60 episodes, that you don't seem to understand? —
YoungForever(talk)06:27, 5 July 2020 (UTC)reply
There are different guidelines and policies on Wikipedia. Yet, you seemed to be fixated on guidelines and policies of Fandom/Wikis. This is not Fandom/Wikia. —
YoungForever(talk)17:45, 5 July 2020 (UTC)reply
It wouldn't be merged if there weren't even any crossovers or specific characters mention. Also, it is not even enough to warrant a List of Bless the Harts characters article yet. —
YoungForever(talk)17:09, 30 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Sure, the second season seems to be the last season of the series, but the cancellation could be an April Fools joke to fool fans, considering that Deadline posted an article about the cancellation on April 1st. But, the viewer ratings are deer lord for the later episodes.
If a third season for the series is picked up, I'm thinking that the series would not be on Fox anymore and would probably move to a streaming service, like Hulu for an example.
It could be wrong if this situation is real, but I do rumor that the cancellation was just an April Fools joke.
I seriously doubt it was an April Fool's joke. If it is canceled, it is canceled. Fox officially confirmed the cancellation which is the fact. Just because you heard a rumor it was just an April Fool's joke and want it to get renewed for a third season, doesn't mean that is the fact. —
YoungForever(talk)22:29, 3 April 2021 (UTC)reply
I don't think it was a rumor. I think the cancellation announcement just came out on the day of and people thought it was a joke. Sadly though, it is true. The network decided to not renew it back back in November and it wasn't officially announced until now.
CartoonnewsCP (
talk)
07:13, 4 April 2021 (UTC)reply
Sadly, it is not a joke. I've known about the cancellation for months (before it was disclosed to the public) and I can verify that it is legit. The show will not get a season 3 on the Fox network. Maybe on Hulu. We just have to hope for the best. The show really picked up this year and it will be sad to see it go. Even if Disney doesn't shop it elsewhere it will always have 34 episodes. Deserved better. F fox. Duncanville better not end too.
CartoonnewsCP (
talk)
07:13, 4 April 2021 (UTC)reply