![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This section was blanked out with the edit reason of "The changes were made in order to reflect the recent hard work of the staff and students at DYCA to achieve some strong and improving results." given. I don't think removing the original criticism is the best way to reflect any improvements in performance, but if there's coverage of some kind that indicates this to be the case I think it'd be a great addition to the page! — 🐻 Nickbear [talk] 16:50, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on David Young Community Academy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:54, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. |
In the last full Ofsted inspection of David Young Community Academy inspectors rated it inadequate in all four assessment criteria.[5] Further to this they found that 'Leaders of the school and the academy trust have failed to fulfil legislative requirements relating to safeguarding and to health and safety'.[6]
In a follow up inspection by Ofsted in May 2016 the lead inspector 'strongly recommend[ed] that the academy does not seek to appoint newly qualified teachers', reflecting the poor nature of the school's academic performance.[7]
Is someone able to update the academic performance section of this article please?
Ofsted Rating is here: https://reports.ofsted.gov.uk/provider/23/144809 Student numbers are approximately 700 - Years 7 - 11 with no sixth form provision.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST - The abbeymat account is owned by the Communications Manager at Abbey Multi Academy Trust. Links provided above are all external to the trust - but full performance information on Bishop Young Academy can be found at: https://www.bishopyoungacademy.co.uk/academy-information-2 Abbeymat ( talk) 15:41, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
![]() | Part of an edit requested by an editor with a conflict of interest has been implemented. [see below] |