Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline
Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically
review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about BioViva.
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hi, I'm Cotton2. Deku-shrub, thanks for creating BioViva!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Bioviva....reversed HER cells... Close to advertising, peacock and violating NPOV. Please rewrite in wp:NPOV style.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Cotton2 ( talk) 20:12, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
I looked at the copyvios report and made some amends where it did indeed look like sentences had been copy-pasted. However as I lack a deep understanding of the tech, I justify the use of the copied quotes.
I hope this article is now in an acceptable state -- Deku-shrub ( talk) 19:14, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
Dr. Kris Kooper ( talk) 02:53, 11 March 2020 (UTC) /info/en/?search=BioViva Dr. Kris Kooper ( talk) 02:53, 11 March 2020 (UTC) 90% of the information on this page was written by the primary source, the CEO of BioViva. It reads like a promotion or infomercial. Once actual Wikipedia editors found the page they wrote honest material stating it’s pseudoscience, not FDA approved, etc. The page is about a Science Company run out of the primary sources home. The primary source has no scientific degrees. No M.D., No PhD, nor any advanced degree in Genetics, Biology, Chemistry, Physics or any science whatsoever. The primary source does not even have a College degree. The page reads like promotion and an infomercial, It’s advertising, peacock and violating NPOV. Then it is rebutted by Wikipedia editors. It is embarrassing with false scientific information and makes BioViva sound like an actual science company whilst Wikipedia editors quote Antonio Regalado of M.I.T., Dr. Bradley Johnson, Associate Professor of Pathology and Lab Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Timothy Caulfield, professor in the The Faculty of Law and the School of Public Health at the University of Alberta, George M Martin, professor of pathology at the University of Washington, Duncan Baird, professor of Cancer and Genetics at Cardiff University's School of Medicine whom all state BioViva and it’s unapproved FDA offshore medical tourism treatment is pseudoscience or worse. I hereby request that this page be taken down completely. It is an embarrassment to Wikipedia. DrKrisKooper moved by Usedtobecool ☎️ 03:50, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
DrKrisKooper Nonsense, this does not address the fact (Redacted) attempted to use it as promotional material and it is still peacock, and violating NPOV. Your joke about “David NotMD” is not funny, those of us who are MD’s worked long and hard learning to help cure the ill not turn Science into a joke. ( BLP violation removed) This page should be removed immediately. DrKrisKooper redactions made by Usedtobecool ☎️ 17:46, 12 March 2020 (UTC)