This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 5 April 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Brentwick,
Jeremy.lan.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 18:02, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 4 September 2018 and 10 December 2018. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Oski999,
Ndieu,
Athenangocvu97,
Thachng88,
Thienng93. Peer reviewers:
Bjarkemy,
Robinwdj.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 18:02, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
BritStewart.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 15:45, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
This thing doesn't deserve it's own article William M. Connolley ( talk) 19:32, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
This has been through the AfD and the result was 'no consensus'. The outcome is therefore to retain the article. See Articles_for_deletion#How_an_AfD_discussion_is_closed. I have therefore rv Atmoz as vandalism. I have given this user repeated warnings about breaching the AfD process. Andrewjlockley ( talk) 07:34, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
Discussion of redirect at Talk:Bio-energy with carbon storage#Bio-energy with carbon capture and storage. - Atmoz ( talk) 07:35, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
Exactly what RELEVANT information from this article is NOT included in the Bio-energy with carbon storage? All relevant information was edited to the Bio-energy with carbon storage already two month ago. If you think that any important and RELEVANT information is missing, I don't see any problem with adding this. Right now your claims are just a WP:WL. Beagel ( talk) 15:32, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
Is it just me or does the phrase "believed to be too much to be able to be absorbed by conventional sinks such as trees and soil" not sound right? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.63.157.35 ( talk) 06:43, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bio-energy with carbon capture and storage. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.geos.ed.ac.uk/sccs/biochar/documents/Bio-CCS%28BECCS%29.pdfWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:27, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
The current projects section only speaks of Illinois when there is currently a new project in Texas as well and 2 others slated to open in the future in Texas and Louisiana. A section detailing all current projects and future projects would add to this page. Current and new projects are listed on the link. https://www.globalccsinstitute.com/projects/large-scale-ccs-projects Ortizj1987 ( talk) 04:54, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
The applications sections list 5 sources that the application can be applied to. Food and drink, the manufacturing of chemicals just to name a few could be added to list of applications. The link provides more information on other applications. https://hub.globalccsinstitute.com/publications/ccs-applications/ccs-applications Ortizj1987 ( talk) 05:09, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
Inherent Separation is another way of capturing CO2. This method is used in gas processing and fermenting based biofuels. Information on this can be found at link. https://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/TechnologyRoadmapCarbonCaptureandStorage.pdf and https://unfccc.int/files/bodies/awg/application/pdf/01_iea_juho_lipponen.pdf Ortizj1987 ( talk) 05:31, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
Another environmental consideration that is not mentioned at all is the increase of Ammonia emissions by 3 times or more. Ammonia contributes to the acidification and eutrophication of the environment. https://www.eea.europa.eu/highlights/carbon-capture-and-storage-could Ortizj1987 ( talk) 05:49, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
Two recent publications might be useful for this article. UNEP (2017) discusses the emissions gap and chapter 7 examines carbon dioxide removal technologies. [1] Geden and Löschel (2017), among other things, note the need for massive negative emissions technology deployment past 2050 and the fact that policymakers have been reluctant to even raise this issue. [2] Contact me if you need access to the second article. With best wishes. RobbieIanMorrison ( talk) 06:35, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
References
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bio-energy with carbon capture and storage. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 14:49, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
Thienng93 ( talk) 23:20, 27 November 2018 (UTC) What is the previous study cases before the implementation of IL-CCS on the industrial scale?
The article that I review is "Bio-energy with Carbon Capture and Storage" on Wikipedia. The information of the article is relevant with the topic. There are some errors that need to fix. For the post-combustion, and re-combustion, the authors need to add more information about these processes. In addition, the information need to update, the IL-CCS was the first project on the world that implemented the BECCS techniques on the industrial scale. Thienng93 ( talk) 23:30, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
I see there is discussion - which I have particpated in - to delete the article. I have added this section so it is better for chronology etc. Why can't we improve the article instead of deleting it? GRALISTAIR ( talk) 19:54, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
The article is well referenced though I admit some more upto date references from peer reviewed academic journals would be useful. I will make a start as I have access to these. GRALISTAIR ( talk) 20:08, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Also it has multiple ratings of C-Class so again, why delete? GRALISTAIR ( talk) 20:09, 11 September 2023 (UTC)