This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The contents of the Binaural beats page were merged into Beat (acoustics) and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Binaural beats redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
This article is tagged with a notice saying that it may include fringe theories. However nowhere on this talk page or anywhere is it indicated which information is "fringe" and which information is reliable. Is it all fringe? Is some part of it fringe? I'm researching this topic and it would be helpful to know. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.131.214.125 ( talk) 23:32, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
User:Johnsgreat what is the source that says that only men listen to binaural beats? Jytdog ( talk) 19:03, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
"It is clear that binaural beats do not represent a one-size-fits-all enhancement technique. They can be effective in enhancing brainstorm-like creative thinking in individuals with low striatal dopamine levels, but they can at the same time impair performance in exactly the same kind of task in others. On the one hand, this calls for more care in the propagation of binaural beats as a cognitive-enhancement method and a better understanding of the underlying neural and cognitive mechanisms. On the other hand, however, it also implies that previous failures to find positive effects of binaural beats on cognitive performance need not be taken as evidence against the efficiency of the manipulation. In fact, careful selection of individuals involving a systematic evaluation of their cognitive control profiles is likely to yield evidence of cognitive enhancement, even under conditions that proved ineffective by previous research." [1]
"As many factors impact upon the efficacy of monaural and binaural-beat stimulation, a more in-depth reporting of beat stimulation parameters and protocols would offer the possibility to limit the methodological inconsistencies that may explain many of the contradictory outcomes reported in the literature. Most importantly, electrophysiological investigations comparing the effects of auditory beats under different stimulation conditions and parameters are still rare. Such studies are necessary as a fundament to allow the development of mechanistic hypotheses explaining the behavioral outcomes of beat stimulation." [2]
References
{{
cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (
link)
{{
cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (
link)
-- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kortoso ( talk • contribs) 20:16, 22 March 2017(UTC)
I started working over the sourcing yesterday and will continue that today. Lots of old, primary sources have been cited, and WP:SYN violated in many places, building arguments by tying primary sources together.
There was also a bunch of OFFTOPIC stuff here that was actually about Neuro-linguistic programming. That belongs in some other article per WP:ONEWAY Jytdog ( talk) 19:38, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
This is mostly a history of the science behind sound localization. Am going to move it there after i finish cleaning up the sourcing... Jytdog ( talk) 20:17, 2 September 2017 (UTC)