This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all
LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the
project page or contribute to the
discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pipe Organ, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Pipe Organ on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pipe OrganWikipedia:WikiProject Pipe OrganTemplate:WikiProject Pipe OrganPipe organ articles
This
Apple Records/
Apple Corps-related article is within the scope of WikiProject The Beatles, which focuses on improving coverage of English rock band
The Beatles and related topics on Wikipedia. Users who are willing to participate in the project should visit the project page, where they can join and see a list of open tasks.The BeatlesWikipedia:WikiProject The BeatlesTemplate:WikiProject The BeatlesThe Beatles articles
Other :Project: Add {{
WikiProject The Beatles}} to the talk pages of all Beatles-related articles. Send a newsletter to members, canvas for new members and coordinate tasks. Enter articles
assessed as stubs onto this list, also list articles needing cleanup and other work here.
This article does not yet have a related to do list. If you can think of any ways to improve the article, why not
create one?
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to
pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
/* Singles */"You're So Unique" UK, "It Will Come in Time" UK and "One More Time for Love" US R&B
Re: Edit
Noticed an error/s which I have rectified.
US----US R&B-----UK
"It Will Come in Time" (with Syreeta Wright) — — 47 (corrected from 47 in US)
"One More Time for Love" (with Syreeta Wright) 52 72 — (added/included #72 in US R&B - confirmed with Syreeta Wright Wikipedia page)
Hope this helps.
Thanks. :)
PS Also noticed and corrected that The song "You're So Unique", did not reach #3 in the UK charts. In fact it failed to make the charts in the UK (which was a Top 50 at the time back in 1974).
"Preston was the only musician to be credited on a Beatles recording other than the group's four members: the group's number-one hit "Get Back" billed as "The Beatles with Billy Preston" There are several other musicians credited on Revolver and Mal Evans is credited on Rubber Soul. He may be the only musician credited on a Beatles single, unless you count Tony Sheridan.
71.190.84.233 (
talk)
23:40, 7 January 2017 (UTC)reply
The article now says, "Preston was one of five musicians[2] credited on a Beatles recording other than the group's four members." What's this about? The reference says nothing so far as I can see, and I've no clear idea who the other four are. Anyone? — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
2A02:C7D:3217:C400:95D5:28A:58F:37BA (
talk)
08:23, 14 September 2019 (UTC)reply
This issue's become confused. Preston was the only musician to receive a joint artist credit on a Beatles recording, which is significant. The two session musicians named on Revolver, Mal Evans on Rubber Soul, etc were rare credits for outside contributors, but that's not the same as the recognition Billy received on the "Get Back" single.
JG66 (
talk)
13:57, 29 October 2020 (UTC)reply
I understand what JG66 means by "that's not the same as..." but that doesn't change the fact that the sentence in the article is misleading or false, given the credit accorded to Alan Civil and others.
"In April 1969, their single "Get Back" was credited to "The Beatles with Billy Preston", the only time such a joint credit had been given on an official Beatles-sanctioned release (as distinct from an unsanctioned reissue of some Hamburg-era recordings on which they were the backing group for Tony Sheridan)." Well, what about the original "My Bonnie" single, where Sheridan definitely was co-credited? Wasn't that record "Beatles-sanctioned"? Or is it supposedly disqualified because The Beatles were billed as "The Beat Brothers"?
Jah77 (
talk)
18:43, 22 October 2021 (UTC)reply
The original 1962 "My Bonnie" single was credited to Tony Sheridan & The Beat Brothers. ATCO and all the other labels put the Beatles name front and center after they became the greatest show on earth.
Hotcop2 (
talk)
23:07, 22 October 2021 (UTC)reply
From the article on Tony Sheridan's "
My Bonnie" album: "The German import became popular in Liverpool and Epstein secured a British release on 5 January 1962, this time credited to Tony Sheridan and the Beatles." The source given is Mark Lewisohn's The Beatles: All These Years, Vol. 1, and the article even has a photo of said single, so I'd say that settles it; Preston wasn't the only person to get performer co-credit with The Beatles.
Jah77 (
talk)
16:10, 23 October 2021 (UTC)reply
Tony Sheridan and the Beat Brothers. Sheridan gave credit to the Beatles, it was his record. Preston was given co-credit by the Beatles, not by a record company a couple of years after the fact. It's not the same thing, but evidently this is important to you. Enjoy.
Hotcop2 (
talk)
20:28, 24 October 2021 (UTC)reply
On the British version of the single, it's Tony Sheridan and The Beatles. "Co-credited" simply means that two or more artists receive joint credit, regardless of who "gave" credit to whom. Evidently it's important to you to prove that Preston's co-credit was more "important" than Sheridan's, but that is a subjective matter that doesn't belong in an encyclopedia. The Beatles and Tony Sheridan were co-credited on a single released before anyone knew who The Beatles were. That's a fact, and your opinion of its historical significance doesn't change that in any way.
Jah77 (
talk)
10:17, 25 October 2021 (UTC)reply
Yes, that's Polydor NH 66833, issued 5 Jan 1962, shown at 45Cat
here. But The Beatles are not the main artist there, so they can't "give credit" to Tony Sheridan? At best it's a single entity with a & in the middle?
Martinevans123 (
talk)
14:52, 25 October 2021 (UTC)reply
The article reads: "...the only time such a co-credit had been given on a Beatles record". Where does it say the co-credit was "given" by The Beatles? If the idea was to refer exclusively to the post-Love Me Do era, reissues of earlier material would be irrelevant by definition and there would have been no need to mention Tony Sheridan in the first place. So either state explicitly that you're referring to a specific part of The Beatles' career and leave Sheridan out of it entirely, or acknowledge that in the early days, they shared a performer co-credit with another artist. The original wording was unclear on what kind of "co-crediting" was being referred to. If somebody wants the sentence to underline the uniqueness of Preston's contribution, I have no problem with that, as long as it's done in a way that makes it clear what exactly is meant by "co-crediting on a Beatles record". ("...the only time an artist was credited as a co-performer with The Beatles after the band started recording as independent artists", or whatever - something that unambiguously rules out Sheridan.)
Jah77 (
talk)
19:23, 25 October 2021 (UTC)reply
Yes, of course. It wasn't the Beatles' decision at that time. It was the record company, i.e. Polydor's, decision 100%. A bit later it would have been Epstein's. That suggested phrasing looks ok to me.
Martinevans123 (
talk)
21:32, 25 October 2021 (UTC)reply
The problematic bit about the original wording was the qualifier "official Beatles-sanctioned release", which wouldn't clearly rule out Sheridan. If no one objects, I'll be happy to change the wording to what I suggested above - or whatever variation of it is deemed appropriate.
Jah77 (
talk)
22:29, 25 October 2021 (UTC)reply
Regardless of all the debate above about Tony Sheridan, the statement about Billy Preston being the only musican credited on a Beatles record is just plain wrong. The French Horn player
Alan Civil was given an explicit credit for
For No One on the back cover of the original LP pressings of Revolver - example can be seen at
https://fontsinuse.com/uses/58642/the-beatles-revolver-album-art
Further digging reveals that five musicians have been credited on Beatles records:
George Martin (several times, including
Not a Second Time and on a couple of tracks on the back of
Rubber Soul; likewise a credit for
Mal ‘Organ’ Evans on Hammond for
You Won't See Me also from Rubber soul ; Anil Bhagwat on Tabla for
Love You To from Revolver as well as the Alan Civil credit for For No One.
Despite what the reference says, I would suggest rewording the article to say "one of the few musicians credited...."
The story of George Harrison quitting the band during the Get Back sessions, going to see Ray Charles in concert and from there convincing Preston to join the Beatles sessions has been pretty well disproven. Ray Charles was not touring in the UK during January 1969. Billy Preston, however, was in fact in London recording a segment for a BBC show on the 19th of January...three days before joining the Beatles sessions. Unfortunately, the supporting source for the misinformation in this Wiki is a Washington Post article, so it's likely never to be changed.
Projectorhead (
talk)
11:16, 19 November 2021 (UTC)reply
Ok, new information has come to light. In the documentary The Beatles: Get Back it is now revealed that "Billy's just arrived in London to film a couple of TV appearances. He drops by to say 'hi' unaware that The Beatles need a keyboard player." We also see the actual footage of John Lennon telling Preston they need someone in on keyboards because they want to do the songs live, and saying "so if you'd like to do that you're welcome to." The incorrect story from the Washington Post should now be taken out, right?
Projectorhead (
talk)
11:34, 29 November 2021 (UTC)reply
I thought this was resolved, but the Beatles or Beat Brothers were given credit on Tony Sheridan's recording; Preston is the only musician credited by the Beatles on a Beatles record.
Hotcop2 (
talk)
00:52, 2 December 2023 (UTC)reply