![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
When I was reading I found it hard to understand some of the sentences because they had so many big words in a row that it was hard to interpret. The sentences were all really long. Maybe use some shorter sentences so the reader has time to process before they read on. Natashakoenig ( talk) 01:06, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
I posted this to the image talk page and am mirroring here: the horizontal axis has numbers but not units, and the vertical axis has no scale at all. This seems to limit its usefulness/appropriateness for use in articles. Any chance of a something better being created? -- EEMIV ( talk) 20:41, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Is it possible to change the terminology from that of 'waves' to 'oscillations' in this series of articles? Oscillation it the preferred term used by neurophysiologists. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kleinhern ( talk • contribs) 11:08, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 03:22, 24 April 2019 (UTC)