A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
the layout style guideline:
Reviewing...
B.
Reliable sources are
cited inline. All content that
could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
6B: The image with the caption "United States Marines MV-22B" needs to be changed to an appropriate caption.
Done
Comments
Please do not change the status of the criterion, the reviewer will change that their selfs.
The first and third image items have been fixed or addressed. For the second item, the file name is long, but why is that really relevant here? -
Fnlayson (
talk)
02:08, 5 May 2010 (UTC)reply
I'm taking over this review, as it has stalled. At this moment I've not decided whether to use the previous review or to start from scratch. I will start by reading the article through a couple of times and then I'll make a decision - this might take most of the weekend, as I have two other review underway as well. When I've decided I will add my comments below.
Pyrotec (
talk)
21:50, 18 June 2010 (UTC)reply
Thanks for taking this over, my normal Wikipedia duties/IRL limited this to jumps of a few min and I just didn't feel like it would be a fair review. I should have posted it here, but I was not able to finish the review as time was not availible to me, but it is on my Talkpage & the Nom's. Anyway, thanks for the takeover. -- /
DeltaQuad|Notify Me\00:12, 19 June 2010 (UTC)reply
I've had a quick read through, but I've not read it all nor checked any of the references. On that basis it looks quite reasonable. I will now review the article in more depth. At this point I'm only looking for "problems", so if I find any that I can't fix myself I'll add them here. This will take a couple of so days, as I've go other reviews to deal with as well.
Pyrotec (
talk)
11:27, 20 June 2010 (UTC)reply