This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It seems to me that if you don't succeed the first five times, perhaps it's not a good idea to try again. - Denimadept 01:16, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
I've currently got the article in both Bridge disasters and Demolished bridges. In all cases, this bridge seemed to come down due to natural causes, not man-made, which makes me think that the "disaster" label is more appropriate. Still, it seems to me to be a bit of an overstatement to call it a "disaster". What makes sense? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Denimadept ( talk • contribs) 01:49, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
You want photos of a bridge which isn't there? Okay... - Denimadept ( talk) 03:19, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Bedell Covered Bridge. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 06:52, 23 February 2016 (UTC)